1. Debunking The Ancient Alien Hypothesis: Meet The Ancient Humans & Giants Whose Descendants Were The Annunaki/ Watchers/ Niphilim/ Egyptian-Gods ("Civilization Bringers") Of Ancient History
2. Debunking The Ancient Aliens Hypothesis: Its The False Historical Timeline That Makes The Remains Of A Forgotten Civilization(s), And Its Mythology, Seem Like A Reference To Aliens Or UFOs To UFO Enthusiasts (With Graham Hancock)
This post is meant to be a collection of detailed information that both debunks the Ancient Aliens series on the History Channel and expands upon evidence of technological advanced connected to our ancient human ancestors, for research purposes. The following video is meant to be supplemented with the links above and below and the additional info on ancient lost technology.
Ancient Aliens Debunked - (full movie) HD
Website: http://ancientaliensdebunked.com INFO:
Click time signatures below: Puma Punku ( 3:38 ) https://www.ancientaliensdebunked.com... The Pyramids ( 22:41 ) https://www.ancientaliensdebunked.com... Baalbek, ( 37:40 ) https://www.ancientaliensdebunked.com... Incan sites ( 55:33 ) https://www.ancientaliensdebunked.com... Easter Island ( 1:01:33 ) https://www.ancientaliensdebunked.com... Pacal's rocket ( 1:05:36 ) https://www.ancientaliensdebunked.com... The Nazca Lines ( 1:13:10 ) https://www.ancientaliensdebunked.com... Tolima "fighter jets ( 1:21:16 ) https://www.ancientaliensdebunked.com... Egyptian "light bulb" ( 1:27:01 ) https://www.ancientaliensdebunked.com... Ufo's in ancient art ( 1:36:08 ) https://www.ancientaliensdebunked.com... The crystal skulls ( 1:46:38 ) https://www.ancientaliensdebunked.com... Ezekiel's Wheel ( 1:58:17 ) https://www.ancientaliensdebunked.com... Ancient nuclear warfare ( 2:11:16 ) https://www.ancientaliensdebunked.com... Vimana's ( 2:20:50 ) https://www.ancientaliensdebunked.com... Anunnaki ( 2:32:52 ) https://www.ancientaliensdebunked.com... Nephilim ( 2:54:37) https://www.ancientaliensdebunked.com... Conclusion ( 3:07:10) Books: Abducting the Truth: The Blogs of Ancient Aliens Debunked https://www.amazon.com/Abducting-Trut... Jason Colavito Debunks Ancient Aliens: https://www.amazon.com/s/ref=as_li_ss... Dr Mike Heiser Books: https://www.amazon.com/Michael-S.-Hei... The Secret of the Great Pyramid by Bob Brier (Author), Jean-Pierre Houdin (Author) https://www.amazon.com/Secret-Great-P... Ancient Aliens Debunked is a 3 hour refutation of the theories proposed on the History Channel series Ancient Aliens. It is essentially a point by point critique of the "ancient astronaut theory" which has been proposed by people like Erich von Däniken and Zecharia Sitchin as well as many others. The film covers topics like: Ancient building sites: Puma Punku, The Pyramids, Baalbek, Incan sites, And Easter Island. Ancient artifacts: Pacal's rocket, the Nazca lines, the Tolima "fighter jets", the Egyptian "light bulb", Ufo's in ancient art, and the crystal skulls. Ancient text issues: Ezekiel's wheel, Ancient nuclear warfare, Vimana's, the Anunnaki, and the Nephilim. All the claims are sourced at the website: http://ancientaliensdebunked.com It was produced by Chris White and includes commentary from Dr. Michael Hesier. It is distributed for free on the internet. Viewers are encouraged to download, share, or burn copies to DVD, as long as they do not profit from its distribution.
Supplement: Given that the historical timeline is shallow and undeveloped certain discoveries have been left out that do not affect the overall debunking of the Ancient Aliens hypothesis but do affect how our history is perceived, i.e. human technology hasn't progressed the linear way we think of, at least in all fields of knowledge. For example; Advanced stone cutting technology goes back 65,000-70,000 years. Megalithic sites, such as Gobekli Tepe, are over 11,000 years old with its oldest megalith pillars being the most advanced (indicating a declining culture from a most advanced state of stone masonry skill).
This 12,000 Year Old Ancient Discovery is Shaking the Foundations of History..
There have been many ancient discoveries around the world that make us question the historical accuracy of our documented past. non more so than the discovery of this ancient stone circle site Gobecklie Tepe. This 12,000 year old site can be found in south-east Turkey and has been dated as the oldest temple ever discovered. A discovery shaking the foundations of known history...Featuring Graham Hancock, Paul Wallis, Freddy Silva, Gregg Braden, Linda moulten Howe, Andrew Collins and Jack Cary
Given that the knowledge of advanced stone working is even more ancient than previously supposed, what else did the ancients think of that can be out of place enough for a person not equipped with historical knowledge to assume is Alien in origin?
6 Advanced Ancient Inventions Beyond Modern Understanding
10 Remarkable Advanced Ancient Technologies Ahead Of Their Times
5 Advanced Ancient Technologies That Shouldn't Be Possible
Top 10 Lost Technologies We Really Could Use Today
Lost Technology in Ancient Egypt: The Great Pyramid with Nassim Haramein & Hugh Newman
An exploration of the Giza Plateau, looking closely at the Great Pyramid with physicist Nassim Haramein and megalithomaniac Hugh Newman. In the video they look at evidence of ancient technology and compare the site to ancient Peru. This was part of the Resonance Academy Delegates Program in Egypt in October 2017.
This pushes back civilization in India even further, with pottery going back 20,000 years;
Science Report Extract From Graham Hancock.com - For decades archaeologists have argued about the origins of the mysterious “Harappan” (Indus Valley) civilisation that flourished across what is now Pakistan and north-west India from about 3000 BC. Now new findings by Indian scientists working in the Gulf of Cambay suggest that the Harappans were descended from an advanced mother culture that flourished at the end of the last Ice Age and that was submerged by rising sea-levels before history began. Report by BADRINARYAN BADRINARYAN, chief geologist with the scientific team from the National Institute of Ocean Technology (NIOT) responsible for the underwater surveys in the Gulf of Cambay.
In the southern township or palaeochannel area six samples suitable for dating were identified. Of these 3 are carbonized wooden samples, one was a sediment sample, one was a fired pottery piece and one hearth material. Sample from the same carbonized wood was sent to National Geophysical Research Institute, Hyderabad, India and Geowissenschaftlicte Gemeinschaftsaulguben, Hannover, Germany for Carbon dating. This was the first sample (Location 21o 03.08’ N ; 72 o30.83 E) from near the southern palaeochannel. This first gave a clue to the age and environment of the civilization. The calibrated age as per NGRI was 9580-9190 BP and as per Hannover Institute it was 9545-9490 BP. It means the age is about 9500 BP and this takes the age by more than 4000 years older than the oldest city civilization of Mesopotomia and a fore-runner to ‘Harappan’ civilization. But this occurred near the top of the stratigraphic coloumn. Because of this it was expected that at the lower levels age will be much older and make the civilization really an ancient one. The wooden piece tested at Birpal Sani Institute at Lucknow, U.P. state gave a calibrated age of 8450 BP. However, two important artifacts were obtained in the near by area at lower levels. These were a nice, thin, pottery and a brownish to red hearth material. Along with it a local clay sediment was also chosen. All the three samples were analysed in the Physical Research Laboratory, Ahmadabad, Gujarat State, using standard Thermoluminescence based pottery dating techniques. As expected the one of the pottery piece whose figure is given, gave a date of 13000 ± 1950 BP. It is an important date. Another pottery piece which was ill-fired, on OSL dating (Location 21 o12.54’ N ; 72 o 30.370’ E) by Oxford University gave an age of 16840 ± 2620 BP. These are the oldest fired pottery pieces obtained sofar in the world. Till the results were out it was from Japan where the oldest potteries were known. The “Jomon” Pottery from the Fukui cave in Kyushu gave 12000 BP uncalibrated age. The pottery findings from Odai Yamamoto gave uncalibrated age of 13500-13800 BP. In the Gulf of cambay civilization already attempts appear to have been made in experimental pottery making. These are seen from effects of fired clays (for making pottery) which gave ages of 20130 ± 2170 BP (Location 21 o 13.720’ N ; 72 o 26.190’ E) and 16600 ± 1150 BP (Location 21 o13.80 ‘N ; 72 o 26.10 E), by OSL as determined by the Oxford University dating lab. The well fired 3 potteries in the northern palaeochannel gave ages of 7506 ± 785 BP, 6097 ± 611 BP (both by Manipur University) and 4330 ± 1330 BP by Oxford University.
Apart from this sun-dried Pottery pieces were collected in these areas. Three of the specimens were dated by OSL facility in Oxford. The results obtained are (1) 31270±2050 BP, (2) 25700±2790 BP and (3) 24590±2390 BP. A black slipped dish which was also sun dried was dated in Oxford by OSL. This gave an age of 26710 ± 1950 BP.
The hearth material from the southern township (Location 21o03.04 N 72o30.70 E) by TL dating from PRL, Ahmedabad gave an age of 10000 ± 1500 BP whereas the hearth material near the top in the northern township gave an age of 3530 ± 330 BP by OSL, Oxford University. One of the charcoal pieces obtained on the northern side was tested by 14C dating in BSIP, Lucknow. It gave calibrated age of 3000 BP. It tallies very well with the age of upper most alluvium in northern Palaeochannel.
The wattle and daub materials which were originally of wood and clay were seen to be burnt but the structure of the wood was well preserved at places (being fossilized). These were tested by OSL at Oxford and by TL at Manipur from the same locations. OSL dating found it to be 5860 ± 720 BP and TL dating determined it to be 5530 ±550 BP. They appear to be a comparatively good match and they reflect the proper ages. They may represent the period at which these structures caught fire.
From the above it is quite clear that the human activity is very evident from about 31000 BP in what is now in the Gulf of Cambay much before the Glacial Maxima at 18000 BP. The ancients were making potteries and were getting them dried initially in the sun. From about 20000 years, it is clear that the ancients are firing the clay to produce pottery. That means they knew how to make, maintain and manage fire. They appear to have succeeded in making fired pottery from about 16800 BP. They knew the art of construction of towns and houses in neat straight line, row after row as picked up by Side Scan Sonar image and wattle and daub structure and from rammed floor. Both the northern and southern townships have continuous habitational sites interspersed with big structures in between. But good quality fired pottery makes it appearance from about 13000 BP. In the southern township (we can call them metropolis) there appears to be organized activity in the form of a community living, a granary (where fossilized food grains were collected) , etc., from about 13000 BP. To the south of this township in the Gulf of Cambay, sidescan Sonar picked up a drowned dead coral colony of 400m long and about 200m wide in a water depths of about 40m substantiated later by sampling. It is a well known fact that these corals live in hardly 2 to 3m water depth very near coastal areas. They require clean environment and good sunlight. Obviously the southern metropolis appears to have been near a sea coast at a particular point of time, when the metropolis itself stood on dry land with a good free flowing river and was a major bustling city. The dating of coral colony like other places by drill core will provide the date of beginning of coral build up in the area and the top sample of coral will reveal the age at which it was drowned giving a direct clue to the drowning of southern metropolis. It is worthwhile noting that the datable objects are found has only up to 8450 BP based on the date of the carbonized wood.
The northern metropolis has well made pottery pieces, wattle daub etc. from about 7506 BP onwards. It indicates well organized city living. Hence it is possible that this metropolis came up after 8450 but much before 7506 BP, may be after the submergence of the southern metropolis. The ancients appear to have shifted and founded the northern metropolis. However the various earlier dates from sun-dried pots etc. indicate that it was under constant habitation.