Aug 30, 2021

FIRE Tucker - The Pedophile - Carlson: During Interviews On Bubba The Love Sponge, Carlson Said He “Love[s]” The Idea Of Young Girls In His Daughters Boarding School "Sexually Experimenting"

At 2:06 Tucker mentions he would love a scenario he wouldn't like with his school age daughter... but anyone else's school age daughter engaging in this Tucker would "love". Do you want Tucker fantasizing about your school age daughter? Do you want a pedophile acting as the face of Fox News? Fire Tucker - The Pedophile - Carlson.

Media Matters: In unearthed audio, Tucker Carlson makes numerous misogynistic and perverted comments - 
During interviews on Bubba The Love Sponge, Carlson said he “love[s]” the idea of young girls sexually experimenting, used sexist terms to refer to a number of women, and defended statutory rape 


Extract from the transcript for this video: After Bubba the Love Sponge described underage girls at Tucker Carlson's daughter’s boarding school experimenting sexually with each other, Carlson said, “If it weren't my daughter I would love that scenario.”

BUBBA THE LOVE SPONGE: The difference between blue-blooded rich people from Georgetown in Washington, D.C., and hillbillies from Warsaw, Indiana? Boarding school, to me when we were growing up, was what they threatened you with when you were a complete dick and unmanageable.

CO-HOST: They called it reform school.

THE LOVE SPONGE: Well, whatever. They said, we're sending you away to school.

CO-HOST: Yeah.

THE LOVE SPONGE: That's like considered a blue-blooded treat in the circles [inaudible] jackass. It's still the same.

CO-HOST: They've got their kids duped.

THE LOVE SPONGE: Yeah.

TUCKER CARLSON: That is so funny. I am gonna -- when I see her this weekend I'm gonna tell her you said that.

THE LOVE SPONGE: How's this prison-like facility doing?

CARLSON: If you had seen it -- it's literally, the school is in a Robin Williams movie and I can never remember -- I've never seen it, but it's Mr. Chips or -- it's a movie that Robin Williams did about boarding school.

CO-HOST: Dead Poets Society?

THE LOVE SPONGE: Yeah. Dead Poets Society.

CARLSON: Yeah. Thank you, thank you, thank you. And it was shot at her school.

THE LOVE SPONGE: Yeah, I bet it was.

CARLSON: It's a good-looking place. I mean, it's a great-looking place.

THE LOVE SPONGE: I know. It costs $60,000 a year. My God.

CARLSON: What they do is they hide the concertina wire. I mean, it's there, you know, but it's behind the guard towers so you can't really see it as well as you would normally. No, trust me, you will send your kids to boarding school.

THE LOVE SPONGE: No, I will not, I promise you that. I love my kids and I want to hang on to them and love them and give them a kiss at night and not have to talk to them via AT&T and text them and things like that. Then they throw me a bone that I get to see them every fifth weekend. That's considered, you know, a privilege. By the way, it's my kid last time I checked. Jesus. You rich people.

CARLSON: My daughter, who's a big Bubba fan, will definitely be amused.

THE LOVE SPONGE: Well tell her that Bubba, big Bubba, is the one that's sticking up for her trying to get her back into the big house. I mean, you're treating her like a slave. Yeah, Master Dad, I'd love to be back in the big house, Master Dad. I don't like living in a dormitory with other bad girls, please, Master Dad. She's probably picking up --

CARLSON: Cold water showers and mush.

THE LOVE SPONGE: Yeah. You don't -- those rich kids, man. It's hard telling some of the stuff she's gonna pick up.

CARLSON: Yeah. It’s -- look, actually, I think it's a more sheltered environment than it is going to--

THE LOVE SPONGE: Yeah.

CO-HOST: Right.

THE LOVE SPONGE: Let me just give you an example, OK? When she's laying her head in your bed at night, you know who the hell's in her bedroom and what they're doing. Nobody, just her. Well, when she's in a dormitory-type setting and these little girls start experiment around, next thing you know, you know, you got a lesbian on your hands.

CARLSON: I don't think -- I don't think that's likely.

CO-HOST: Next thing you know, boom.

CARLSON: I don't think that's --

THE LOVE SPONGE: Boom. Next thing you know --

CO-HOST: Lesbian.

CARLSON: I don't think that's likely. I just don't see it.

THE LOVE SPONGE: Next thing you know, [inaudible], what's going on in the [inaudible] dormitory? Nothing. I don't got a PSP to play, I ain't got nothing going on, I ain't got my mom and dad here telling me that they love me and tuck me in bed. So, here's Trixie, she wants to explore my body a little bit, so hey, let's go crazy.

CO-HOST: Wow. You're a sicko.

CARLSON: If it weren't my daughter I would love that scenario.

CO-HOST: That's one theory.

THE LOVE SPONGE: Well I mean it's a -- Manson, Manson, can you tell him --

CARLSON: But I just can't. And I just think that's pretty unlikely --

THE LOVE SPONGE: As outlandish as that is, how old is your daughter?

CARLSON: 14.

THE LOVE SPONGE: Manson, can you please try to help me out here.

CO-HOST: No. I think you're on your own on this one. I think you're crazy.

THE LOVE SPONGE: Screw you, Manson. Fourteen-year-old girls, man, are getting into that sort of deal. Manson, you yourself told me that the new cool thing amongst girls is what?

CO-HOST: To be a fake lesbian.

THE LOVE SPONGE: Thank you. So you don't think that does not go into the blue-blooded boarding houses as well?

CO-HOST: Well if you've raised your daughter right she's not gonna, you know --

THE LOVE SPONGE: OK. I'm telling you, peer pressure's a bitch, especially when your mom and dad aren't there to solidify it every day. I'm telling ya. Nobody wants to listen to me.

CARLSON: Yeah, I think it's much less likely. [Bubba the Love Sponge Show, via YouTube, 10/25/09

More about Tucker - The Pedophile - Carlson (He's also a domestic terrorist who spreads lies about medical information thus spreading lies that kill people!):

Related Posts:

1. Tucker The White Supremacist Terrorist: Tucker Carlson, The Face Of Fox News, Just Gave His Full Endorsement To The White Nationalist Conspiracy Theory That Has Motivated Mass Shootings

2. An Exploration Of Tucker Carlson's Tactics, History & Links To The Increase Of White Nationalism & Terrorism With John Oliver & NBC News

3. White Nationalists Praise Tucker Carlson For Mainstreaming Their Beliefs But Are Disappointed In The Obvious Attempt To Water Down Their Talking Points

4. Tucker The Pedophile: During interviews on Bubba The Love Sponge, Carlson said he “love[s]” the idea of young girls sexually experimenting, used sexist terms to refer to a number of women, and defended statutory rape

5. More Evidence Of Tucker Carlson Being A Pedophile: Harassing School Kids On A Regular Basis And Defending Roy Moore


The Worst of Tucker Carlson | The Daily Show

Tucker Carlson: white supremacist mass shooter copycat and Jeopardy winner. Here’s the absolute worst of Tucker Carlson. #DailyShow #TuckerCarlson


Aug 27, 2021

AE911Truth.org News: Spike Lee Is Right: Fire Can’t Melt Steel — and Molten Metal Was Everywhere (Mainstream Media Is Too Incompetent To Notice Video Evidence Of Molten Metal)

Related: AE911Truth.org News: University Study Finds Fire Did Not Cause Building 7’s Collapse on 9/11 (Video/Visual Demonstrations)

AE911Truth.org: Spike Lee Is Right: Fire Can’t Melt Steel — and Molten Metal Was Everywhere

In yet another episode of the media spreading misinformation about 9/11, several news outlets have misconstrued Spike Lee's recent claim that fires could not have melted the WTC steel, suggesting Lee is wrong because the steel didn't need to melt for the buildings to collapse. This is a red herring. Molten metal was seen pouring out of the South Tower and was witnessed by many people at Ground Zero. This is clear-cut evidence of the use of thermite.

15 Ground Zero Part 1 Melted Steel Beams and Molten Iron - ESO - Experts Speak Out

These are the individual Chapters from the 90 minute version of 9/11: Explosive Evidence - Experts Speak Out which is the documentary film by the 2,000 strong Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth founded by Richard Gage, AIA in 2007 whose mission is to obtain a real investigation into the destruction of all THREE World Trade Center high-rises on 9/11.


AE911Truth.org News:


Research on how media deceives (its patterns of behavior and deception);

Media's War On The People

Aug 22, 2021

An Outline Of The Official US Government Declassified Report On UFOs/UAPs With A Sprinkling Of Mainstream News Reports And Why I Think "Foreign Adversary" Can Be Removed As A Category From The Report

The official US Government report on UAP/UFOs covers 5 points. Here are summaries in point form followed by extracts from the official reports... sprinkled with news reports to see what the media is talking about. Then a little bit of analysis.

1. We have limited our data set to a review. We only recently set up a proper process for submitting UFO/UAP reports. Only UFO/UAP reports between 2004 and 2021 are considered but they do seem to be real objects. i.e. all reports of UFOs not in the last 20 years that comes from mostly military sources are ignored in this report.

Official Report: The limited amount of high-quality reporting on unidentified aerial phenomena (UAP) hampers our ability to draw firm conclusions about the nature or intent of UAP. The Unidentified Aerial Phenomena Task Force (UAPTF) considered a range of information on UAP described in U.S. military and IC (Intelligence Community) reporting, but because the reporting lacked sufficient specificity, ultimately recognized that a unique, tailored reporting process was required to provide sufficient data for analysis of UAP events. 

• As a result, the UAPTF concentrated its review on reports that occurred between 2004 and 2021, the majority of which are a result of this new tailored process to better capture UAP events through formalized reporting.

• Most of the UAP reported probably do represent physical objects given that a majority of UAP were registered across multiple sensors, to include radar, infrared, electro-optical, weapon seekers, and visual observation.


Important point: Of 144 reports from military sources, only 1 has been identified as something that CAN be explained. And that was a deflating balloon. All other reports remain unexplained and many were on military training grounds or around military operations.

Official Report: These reports describe incidents that occurred between 2004 and 2021, with the majority coming in the last two years as the new reporting mechanism became better known to the military aviation community. We were able to identify one reported UAP with high confidence. In that case, we identified the object as a large, deflating balloon. The others remain unexplained. 

• 144 reports originated from USG sources. Of these, 80 reports involved observation with multiple sensors. o Most reports described UAP as objects that interrupted pre-planned training or other military activity

US releases UFO report with 'no explanation' for 143 sightings | DW News - The United States government has released a highly anticipated report about Unidentified Flying Objects sightings in the US. According to the report the government can't explain as many as 143 objects that were encountered by military aircraft in the last several decades. Despite speculation in social media, the US government's report doesn't entertain an extraterrestrial explanation for sightings. But it does say that identifying the objects or phenomena may be beyond the existing means of the American military.


An American version of the news report;

CBS This Morning: UFO report: U.S. has no explanation for over 140 "unidentified aerial phenomena" - A U.S. government report on UFOs could not find an explanation for 143 sightings of unidentified aerial phenomena. The report says there's no evidence the objects came from outer space or a foreign adversary. David Martin reports.


2. Some UFOs/UAPs are awesome!

 Official Report: In a limited number of incidents, UAP reportedly appeared to exhibit unusual flight characteristics. These observations could be the result of sensor errors, spoofing, or observer misperception and require additional rigorous analysis

This point seems to be taken from a position of "we don't believe it" as the explanation later on in the report on this point is a bit more definitive in its language:

And a Handful of UAP Appear to Demonstrate Advanced Technology 

In 18 incidents, described in 21 reports, observers reported unusual UAP movement patterns or flight characteristics. 

Some UAP appeared to remain stationary in winds aloft, move against the wind, maneuver abruptly, or move at considerable speed, without discernable means of propulsion. In a small number of cases, military aircraft systems processed radio frequency (RF) energy associated with UAP sightings. 

The UAPTF holds a small amount of data that appear to show UAP demonstrating acceleration or a degree of signature management. Additional rigorous analysis are necessary by multiple teams or groups of technical experts to determine the nature and validity of these data. We are conducting further analysis to determine if breakthrough technologies were demonstrated.


Today: Government’s UFO Report Reveals Many Unexplained Objects

Recently there have been many sightings and reports of “unexplained aerial phenomena or UAPs, and the bottom line from a long-awaited report is that the government can’t explain most of them. NBC’s Tom Costello reports for TODAY.


3. The report says that they have decided to make five possible categories for all UAP/UFO observations reported:

 Official Report: There are probably multiple types of UAP requiring different explanations based on the range of appearances and behaviors described in the available reporting. Our analysis of the data supports the construct that if and when individual UAP incidents are resolved they will fall into one of five potential explanatory categories: airborne clutter, natural atmospheric phenomena, USG or U.S. industry developmental programs, foreign adversary systems, and a catchall “other” bin.

These categories are later described in the official report as:

Airborne Clutter: These objects include birds, balloons, recreational unmanned aerial vehicles (UAV), or airborne debris like plastic bags that muddle a scene and affect an operator’s ability to identify true targets, such as enemy aircraft. 

Natural Atmospheric Phenomena: Natural atmospheric phenomena includes ice crystals, moisture, and thermal fluctuations that may register on some infrared and radar systems. 

USG or Industry Developmental Programs: Some UAP observations could be attributable to developments and classified programs by U.S. entities. We were unable to confirm, however, that these systems accounted for any of the UAP reports we collected. 

Foreign Adversary Systems: Some UAP may be technologies deployed by China, Russia, another nation, or a non-governmental entity.  

Other: Although most of the UAP described in our dataset probably remain unidentified due to limited data or challenges to collection processing or analysis, we may require additional scientific knowledge to successfully collect on, analyze and characterize some of them. We would group such objects in this category pending scientific advances that allowed us to better understand them. The UAPTF intends to focus additional analysis on the small number of cases where a UAP appeared to display unusual flight characteristics or signature management. 


The last "catchall" other category opens up the alien question, for which there isn't enough evidence, for or against (kinda, there are only 2 possibilities in my opinion and one of them is aliens, the other is a secret American based program.);

TODAY: Long-Awaited UFO Report Leaves Central Questions Unanswered

The U.S. government released a highly anticipated report on UFOs late Friday, but it didn’t answer the central question: What are those mysterious flying objects spotted by military pilots in recent years? Reporting for Weekend TODAY, NBC’s Courtney Kube speaks with astrophysicist Neil deGrasse Tyson, who says he isn’t convinced the current data points to extraterrestrial aliens.


4. This is the most important point: The report actually says thats UFOs/UAPs threaten National Security and airplane flying conditions. This means they are real and more advanced than us in avionics. This is important enough to repeat. The UFOs/UAPs I consider to be "real" are ones showing up at military training grounds - as described in the report - with impunity. Showing they are technologically more advanced than our military. 

Official Report: UAP THREATEN FLIGHT SAFETY AND, POSSIBLY, NATIONAL SECURITY 

UAP pose a hazard to safety of flight and could pose a broader danger if some instances represent sophisticated collection against U.S. military activities by a foreign government or demonstrate a breakthrough aerospace technology by a potential adversary. 

Ongoing Airspace Concerns 

When aviators encounter safety hazards, they are required to report these concerns. Depending on the location, volume, and behavior of hazards during incursions on ranges, pilots may cease their tests and/or training and land their aircraft, which has a deterrent effect on reporting. 

• The UAPTF has 11 reports of documented instances in which pilots reported near misses with a UAP. 

Potential National Security Challenges 

We currently lack data to indicate any UAP are part of a foreign collection program or indicative of a major technological advancement by a potential adversary. We continue to monitor for evidence of such programs given the counter intelligence challenge they would pose, particularly as some UAP have been detected near military facilities or by aircraft carrying the USG’s most advanced sensor systems. 


5. The last point simply asks for more money to do more research.

Official Report: Consistent consolidation of reports from across the federal government, standardized reporting, increased collection and analysis, and a streamlined process for screening all such reports against a broad range of relevant USG data will allow for a more sophisticated analysis of UAP that is likely to deepen our understanding. Some of these steps are resource-intensive and would require additional investment.


What the report states from the start:

1. We don't have enough information to make any conclusions but we are continuing to collect data.

Official Report: This report provides an overview for policymakers of the challenges associated with characterizing the potential threat posed by UAP while also providing a means to develop relevant processes, policies, technologies, and training for the U.S. military and other U.S. Government (USG) personnel if and when they encounter UAP, so as to enhance the Intelligence Community’s (IC) ability to understand the threat. The Director, UAPTF, is the accountable official for ensuring the timely collection and consolidation of data on UAP. The dataset described in this report is currently limited primarily to U.S. Government reporting of incidents occurring from November 2004 to March 2021. Data continues to be collected and analyzed.


2. One of the assumptions in the report is that while some UFOs/UAPs are detected normally - and are real - a small fraction may simply be sensor error. 

Official Report: Assumptions: Various forms of sensors that register UAP generally operate correctly and capture enough real data to allow initial assessments, but some UAP may be attributable to sensor anomalies.


Why I think we can removed Russia, China or any other nation as the source of the UAPs/UFOs.

What wasn't mentioned in the news reports was that alot of stories about UFOs/UAPs going back decades has been left out (list complied below). Was the person preparing the report trying to make people feel afraid of Russia or China by leaving out old UFO incidents to make the foreign adversary category feasible? Putin did use the word "hyper velocity" for his new fast stealth missiles recently which is a word the Navy pilots use to describe what they saw and claims to be a world leader in "hyper sonic weapons". Does Putin see an opportunity here? The right does seem to love him, maybe this will make the right fear him more and thus respect him more? Its impossible for Russia to be the source of UFOs/UAPs if incidents of UFOs going back to the 1950s are included (see list of links below). And the report DOES specifically say that it doesn't consider incidents before 2004. If the report's analysis was based solely on info from 2004-2021 with absolutely no awareness of any incidents before that time, only then could conceiving of a foreign adversary be a feasible idea. Intentional or accident?

Anyways, alot of people feel vindicated for thier experiences even when their experiences invalidates one of the categories of the report. Here is one such example of another radar incident but with a civilian this time (reminiscent of the UAP/UFO radar video confirmed as real by the Pentagon). Of course, the radar event in this story predates any event included in the official report by 10 years (its from 1994)

WOODTV8: UFO report ‘vindication’ for man who tracked 1994 sightings on radar 

It was the night of March 8, 1994. Working at the National Weather Service, Bushong’s radar was lighting up with stuff he’d never seen before. (July 29, 2021)



Below are stories of UFOs going back decades before the official report in the mainstream media (with interviews of navy pilots included), carefully researched by me. There are stories of UFOs/UAPs going back decades (all the way to the 1950s!). With interviews of military pilots just like has been done recently on 60 minutes, i.e. these are ALL military pilots saying the same thing going back decades. Is the report implying that another nation has had aerial superiority since the 1950s, through all our conflicts, and didn't use it to gain power? Thats just nuts. Look at the dates on these stories and how similar many of them are to whats recently been declassified! Even UAP/UFO that can also go underwater, that has recently confirmed by the Pentagon, has been sighted as far back as 1966 and the incident in the report is only from the years 2004-2021. That means that UFO has been here for over 50 years or goes back and forth at will from time to time (if its an alien vessel) or there is a base somewhere here close by or both. But certainly not a foreign adversary. Only possibility left is that its a secret American program.

Full Episodes Of 'UFO Hunters' Relevant To What's Already Been Confirmed By The Pentagon



There can ONLY be 2 possibilities for UFOs/UAPs (I'm ruling our lightning balls, magical/natural phenomenon such as rocks flying in formation in the sky for fun), Bermuda Triangle, secret underground civilizations and sea serpents right from the start);

1. American based secret program. Operating so far above the law even the military doesn't know about them or even the President. Seems unlikely given recent events such as declassifying videos and issuing a report on the phenomenon but anything is possible. Also, a secret American program that didn't help in conflicts since the 1950s? Doesn't make any sense. 

2. Alien vessels. Maybe amoungst the millions of stars someone got more advanced than us and got here first. 

Basically, if you include all stories of UFOs going back to the 1950s then the Russia/China question would be moot as its ridiculous to think our foreign adversaries have had better technology than us through all our conflicts. They would have used it if they had. We are the only ones who could have this technology if its not aliens.

Here are more UFO/UAP news reports and even some sightings by news camera's that haven't been included in any analysis in mainstream media:

UFO/UAP News


Aug 13, 2021

UFO/UAP Eye Witnesses In The News: Police Confirmed Triangular UFO Sighting - National Geographic (UFO Moves Slowly Over Several Counties)

A massive triangular object (possibly similar to one previously confirmed by the Pentagon), seen by 5 cops and 1 civilian in Illinois.

Police Confirmed UFO Sighting | National Geographic

At first, police mocked the 911 call about the UFO sighting--but then they saw it too.



UFO/UAP News



Aug 12, 2021

AE911Truth.org News: University Study Finds Fire Did Not Cause Building 7’s Collapse on 9/11 (Video/Visual Demonstrations)

Scientific researchers have proven that the NIST lied and is continuing to lie, about how the third building fell on 9/11. Of course, if one building fell from demolition than that opens the door to the twin towers being possibility demolished. Its clear this would overturn our political establishment that supported the crimes against America and humanity conducted by the Bush Administration.

AE911Truth.org: University Study Finds Fire Did Not Cause Building 7’s Collapse on 9/11

On March 25, 2020, researchers at the University of Alaska Fairbanks issued the final report of a four-year computer modeling study on the collapse of World Trade Center Building 7.

The 47-story WTC 7 was the third skyscraper to be completely destroyed on September 11, 2001, collapsing rapidly and symmetrically into its footprint at 5:20 PM. Seven years later, investigators at the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) concluded that WTC 7 was the first steel-framed high-rise ever to have collapsed solely as a result of normal office fires.

Contrary to the conclusions of NIST, the UAF research team found that the collapse of WTC 7 on 9/11 was caused not by fires but by the near-simultaneous failure of every column in the building.

Following the release of this report, AE911Truth and 10 family members of 9/11 victims submitted a formal request for correction to NIST’s report on WTC 7 based partially on the UAF findings. The request is currently pending.

Downloads: Final Report | Abstract | Request for Correction


Video Demonstrations:

Study says the Building would have broken in half and fallen if the column faliure is as NIST said it would be:

Figure 4.16 Hypothetical Failure of Columns 76 to 81 — UAF WTC 7 Draft Report


What we actually saw, all columns collapse simultaneously as if dissolved by acid in seconds all at once; 

Figure 4.17a Near-Simultaneous Failure of All Columns, Perspective 1


THUS WTC 7 DID NOT FALL FROM FIRE BUT FROM A COLLAPSE OF ALL STEEL BEAMS FOR NO SCIENTIFIC REASON! (if demolition is removed as a possibility as the NIST is required to do)

Put in context: 

Here you see a modern steel and concrete building - up to code - fall from fire. Something that hasn't happened anywhere around the world for buildings with fire infinitely more intense than the one in WTC 7 on 9/11.

Figure 4.17a Video of WTC 7 Collapse, Perspective 1



Compare the WTC 7 fire to buildings that were actually on fire, i.e. they had a real fire burning and didn't fall... WTC 7 is the image on the bottom right which fell from a tiny itty bitty fire (thats impossible no matter how much you want to believe otherwise);



Project Information

Lead Researcher

Dr. J. Leroy Hulsey
Professor of Civil Engineering, University of Alaska Fairbanks

Research Assistants

Dr. Feng Xiao
Associate Professor, Nanjing University of Science and Technology

Dr. Zhili Quan
Bridge Engineer, South Carolina Department of Transportation

Project Dates

May 1, 2015 – December 31, 2019

Funding

$316,153 (provided by Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth)


Facebook Page

AE911Truth.org News:

Aug 11, 2021

Obama On The UFO/UAP Phenomenon: 'We Don't Know What They Are'

Reggie Watts to Barack Obama: What's w/ Dem Aliens?

Late Late Show bandleader Reggie Watts uses his question of the night to first press President Barack Obama on his knowledge about UFOs, footage of which is being unclassified and makes a compelling case.


News reports on this segment:

Fox News: Obama says UFO sightings are real

Former president Barack Obama says UFO sightings are real.



In the wake of an explosive "60 Minutes" story highlighting UFO sightings by U.S. Navy pilots, former President Barack Obama opened up about the existence of UFOs and alien life in an interview with James Corden. "When it comes to aliens, there are some things I just can't tell you on air," Obama said jokingly. Obama said to Corden that he was eager to find out about real alien encounters when he became president. Recently, three videos from the Navy showed "unidentified aerial phenomena." #InsideEdition



UFO/UAP News

Aug 3, 2021

Exploring UFOs/UAPs In Media: UFO Hunters: Invasion: Illinois (Incidents Going Back To 2004)

With the confirmation of UFOs/UAPs by the Pentagon, other stories about UFOs in the media take on more significance. Stories here start from 2004 and could possibly have been included in the official analysis.

UFO Hunters: Invasion: Illinois (Season 2, Episode 1) | Full Episode | History



Full Episodes Of 'UFO Hunters' Relevant To What's Already Been Confirmed By The Pentagon