Aug 12, 2021

AE911Truth.org News: University Study Finds Fire Did Not Cause Building 7’s Collapse on 9/11 (Video/Visual Demonstrations)

Scientific researchers have proven that the NIST lied and is continuing to lie (or are incompetent, i.e. some intern running the place seems likely), about how the third building fell on 9/11. Of course, if one building fell from demolition than that opens the door to the twin towers being possibility demolished. Its clear this would overturn our political establishment that supported the crimes against America and humanity conducted by the Bush Administration and supported by the GOP, Media and other political allies. The political establishment/government is clearly fighting to protect the lies it supports in its war on America and its constitution (which the GOP and its allies have probably won by now, killing truth forever).

AE911Truth.org: University Study Finds Fire Did Not Cause Building 7’s Collapse on 9/11

On March 25, 2020, researchers at the University of Alaska Fairbanks issued the final report of a four-year computer modeling study on the collapse of World Trade Center Building 7.

The 47-story WTC 7 was the third skyscraper to be completely destroyed on September 11, 2001, collapsing rapidly and symmetrically into its footprint at 5:20 PM. Seven years later, investigators at the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) concluded that WTC 7 was the first steel-framed high-rise ever to have collapsed solely as a result of normal office fires.

Contrary to the conclusions of NIST, the UAF research team found that the collapse of WTC 7 on 9/11 was caused not by fires but by the near-simultaneous failure of every column in the building.

Following the release of this report, AE911Truth and 10 family members of 9/11 victims submitted a formal request for correction to NIST’s report on WTC 7 based partially on the UAF findings. The request is currently pending.

Downloads: Final Report | Abstract | Request for Correction


Video Demonstrations:

Study says the Building would have broken in half and fallen if the column faliure is as NIST said it would be:

Figure 4.16 Hypothetical Failure of Columns 76 to 81 — UAF WTC 7 Draft Report


What we actually saw, all columns collapse simultaneously as if dissolved by acid in seconds all at once; 

Figure 4.17a Near-Simultaneous Failure of All Columns, Perspective 1


THUS WTC 7 DID NOT FALL FROM FIRE BUT FROM A COLLAPSE OF ALL STEEL BEAMS FOR NO SCIENTIFIC REASON! (if demolition is removed as a possibility as the NIST is required to do)

Put in context: 

Here you see a modern steel and concrete building - up to code - fall from fire. Something that hasn't happened anywhere around the world for buildings with fire infinitely more intense than the one in WTC 7 on 9/11.

Figure 4.17a Video of WTC 7 Collapse, Perspective 1



Compare the WTC 7 fire to buildings that were actually on fire, i.e. they had a real fire burning and didn't fall... WTC 7 is the image on the bottom right which fell from a tiny itty bitty fire (thats impossible no matter how much you want to believe otherwise);



Project Information

Lead Researcher

Dr. J. Leroy Hulsey
Professor of Civil Engineering, University of Alaska Fairbanks

Research Assistants

Dr. Feng Xiao
Associate Professor, Nanjing University of Science and Technology

Dr. Zhili Quan
Bridge Engineer, South Carolina Department of Transportation

Project Dates

May 1, 2015 – December 31, 2019

Funding

$316,153 (provided by Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth)


Facebook Page

AE911Truth.org News:

No comments:

Post a Comment