Oct 5, 2016

On 9/11 - The Few VS The Many: How A Few Experts Using "Government Authority" Managed To Outweigh The Many On Network News

What you will see in this post is startling visual evidence and expert testimony that proves how absurd "9/11 experts" sponsored by the Government (and their true believers) really are.

Generally science works by consensus and experiment with the majority winning out overtime as the evidence becomes clearer. With 9/11 the opposite is happening. Except for the dumb (which constitute a large part of any educational output) most experts will agree on certain scientific principles because that's simply how things work.

The evidence:

9/11: NIST engineer John Gross denies WTC molten steel (extended)

Scientists Examine the Molten Steel that Lingered for Weeks Underneath WTC 1, 2 & 7 on 9/11 - Many Surprises Found

Dr. Steven Jones does a chemical analysis of what little remaining steel there is from the World Trade Center. Only a small amount of the WTC steel escaped the Bush Administration's aggressive and quick recycling program. The results point to the use thermate/thermite cutter charges. If the World Trade Center was brought down with explosives, who placed them there? We need a new investigation into the events of September 11 RIGHT AWAY!

9-11 Molten Steel Forensic Evidence & Eyewitness Accounts

MIT Engineer Disputes 911 Theory of the WTC Collapse-Part 1

MIT Engineer Disputes 911 Theory of the WTC Collapse-Part 2

Highlights (screenshots);

(They also left out the concrete)

C-Span interviews the founder of Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth, Richard Gage (a whole group of experts banding aorund the same issue):

An Investigative Hearing In Toronto Canada Chaired By Judges Called For A New Investigation Into The Attacks Of 9/11 

A compilation of a hearing of experts on the tenth anniversary of 9/11 in Toronto, Canada.

9/11: Decade of Deception (Full Film NEW 2015)

On the tenth anniversary of the Attacks of September 11th, 2001, expert witnesses gathered at Ryerson University in Toronto, Canada to provide evidence-based research that called into question the official story of 9/11. This was known as The Toronto Hearings on 9/11.

Over a period of four days, these experts in Structural Engineering, Physics, Chemistry, and History gave researched and professional testimony to an international panel of distinguished judges. The panel of judges, in conjunction with the steering committee would go on to publish their final analysis of the evidence provided, which called for a new investigation into the Attacks of September 11th, 2001.

This film is a summary of the strongest evidence given over the four days of hearings. To see the hearings in their entirety please visit http://torontohearings.org/ or read the final report available on the aforementioned website.

For more info on The Toronto Hearings on 9/11 visit:

For the full 6 hour DVD visit:

Support Press For Truth by becoming a PFT Patron at http://www.patreon.com/PressForTruth
Shout out goes to some of my first PFT Patrons Martin Hill, Halvor Dingsøyr and Maverick Wilson! 



One of the things argued in the official report of 9/11 was that no explosions were heard so demolitions couldn't have been used... despite the evidence you see in front of your eyes of impossible architectural phenomenon.

Problem is that the firefighters did hear explosions;

9/11 - WTC 7 Explosion on Audio (heard by firemen)

World Trade Center on 9/11 - Sounds of Explosions

9/11 FireFighters - THREE Explosions After Plane Hit WTC

9/11 explosions:

Weird Stuff About 9/11

9/11 Chronicles

Introduction To The State Of The USA Today

No comments:

Post a Comment