Background:
Case Study: Is Fox News Using Emotional Manipulation To Control It's Viewers? (Kinda Like How People Think Hypnosis Works)
Case Study: A Look GOP/FoxNews Hypnosis Techniques Using Glenn Beck's Example
Case Study: Fox News... Following The Path Of Jesus?
Introduction To The Class Warfare Being Waged by The GOP & Fox News On America OR "Actual elephants are more useful than the GOP"
PRE-ANALYSIS 1 OF THE ZIMMERMAN TRIAL
7/2/2013
3:20 - He looked around at a car approaching him in the rain."it's better to just call"
Bushs are about 1 foot high. Maybe less. Where Zimmerman said he saw Martin "He went passed me and was looking at my car ... and at the houses around"... He was angry that the kid was looking at his car?
5:13 - ???
6:00 - No bushes
6:40 - Doesn't remember street where he lives ... he not only forgot... he had to get out of his car to see a street sign!
9:30 - Talks in a very calm and confident manner.
10:10 - Bush's are sparse, see through and about 2 feet high with about 20-25 feet of distance between those sparse bushes.
10:30 - you got a problem now - i.e. stereotype of an angry black man
10:36 - Zimmerman is talking like that kid lives in the hood!
11:14 - 'That's when I started screaming help as loud as I could'
11:30 - The sidewalk has a great edge to fake a head injury on...
Bushs are about 1 foot high. Maybe less. Where Zimmerman said he saw Martin "He went passed me and was looking at my car ... and at the houses around"... He was angry that the kid was looking at his car?
5:13 - ???
6:00 - No bushes
6:40 - Doesn't remember street where he lives ... he not only forgot... he had to get out of his car to see a street sign!
9:30 - Talks in a very calm and confident manner.
10:10 - Bush's are sparse, see through and about 2 feet high with about 20-25 feet of distance between those sparse bushes.
10:30 - you got a problem now - i.e. stereotype of an angry black man
10:36 - Zimmerman is talking like that kid lives in the hood!
11:14 - 'That's when I started screaming help as loud as I could'
11:30 - The sidewalk has a great edge to fake a head injury on...
Notice the pattern of his head injuries...
Seems more likely he missed hitting his own head on the sidewalk with that higher head wound than some kid pushing his head back because 1. His neck didn't break 2. He didn't mention Martin picking him up so he could hit his head backwards on the ground (am I not right?)...
11:51 'I put my hand on his nose, I mean his hand on mine.' (Similar to Mitt Romney's Elk/Moose story). Note that he expresses the anger of the attacker VERY well.
12:00 - ' I felt my head was going to explode' i.e. pity technique
12:30 - Relieved story is almost over
12:45 - Black kids walk in the background. He doesn't even look. Could he be the kind who only looks at hoodied kids?
? - The football, roadside wrestling kid went for his firearm. After his jacket went up... he's showing that he was being very considerate in being beaten while not drawing his firearm.
13:30 - Zimmerman shot Martin and then thought he was just joking around when Martin said 'you got me'. So he got on top of him and set his body in some sort of cross position!
12:00 - ' I felt my head was going to explode' i.e. pity technique
12:30 - Relieved story is almost over
12:45 - Black kids walk in the background. He doesn't even look. Could he be the kind who only looks at hoodied kids?
? - The football, roadside wrestling kid went for his firearm. After his jacket went up... he's showing that he was being very considerate in being beaten while not drawing his firearm.
13:30 - Zimmerman shot Martin and then thought he was just joking around when Martin said 'you got me'. So he got on top of him and set his body in some sort of cross position!
PRE-ANALYSIS 1 OF THE ZIMMERMAN TRIAL
7/2/2013
Zimmerman volunteered for his neighborhood watch group, but he was not on duty the night of Martin’s death. He told police he had forgotten he was wearing his gun holster – with his gun in it – that night, until he felt it during the altercation with Martin. Zimmerman told police it all began when he was driving through the neighborhood and spotted Martin on a neighbor’s lawn.(Video one of the interactive)
29 secs: Zimmerman's excuse is that there was a burglary nearby so he was suspicious. Yet in his story Martin walked AROUND his car. I don't know of any burglars, especially solo burglars, who will walk around cars following them if they are being followed. It defies common sense. If he was suspicious that Trayvon was a burglar then as soon as he went around Zimmerman's car that suspicion should have dissipated.
37 secs: Not only did his suspicion NOT dissipate when it SHOULD have... he got out and followed the kid even though he was told not to.
49 secs: 'There is an altercation' i.e. Zimmerman 1. saw Martin go round his car, 2. Didn't listen to dispathcer 3. Forgot he had his gun with him when he got out of his car to follow him. i.e. If a black guy said this he would have been dead by now.
37 secs: Not only did his suspicion NOT dissipate when it SHOULD have... he got out and followed the kid even though he was told not to.
49 secs: 'There is an altercation' i.e. Zimmerman 1. saw Martin go round his car, 2. Didn't listen to dispathcer 3. Forgot he had his gun with him when he got out of his car to follow him. i.e. If a black guy said this he would have been dead by now.
PRE-ANALYSIS 2 OF THE ZIMMERMAN TRIAL
7/2/2013
50 secs: You see a hooded guy in the "dark" i.e. there is more than enough light to spot a burglar YET Martin is standing and walking around in plain sight in a neighborhood where hoodies are unknown (probably the only such neighborhood in America).
1:07: Not only could he see Martin, Martin didn't run. He was just walking around his neighborhood. Very suspicious activity for a burglar indeed! Not so suspicious for someone who lives there but VERY suspicious for a burglar!
1:13: Now Martin is walking towards the guy on the phone... even more suspicious for a burglar to do.
1:21: Martin is running (as opposed to "skipping" as in the Hannity Interview)
1:55: Even more suspicious. Not only does the Burglar run/skip away. He goes around the car. Stands around. ... I'm thinking Zimmerman just didn't like how he looked or didn't like his face or cloths.
2:47: OBJECTION. Hearsay.
1:07: Not only could he see Martin, Martin didn't run. He was just walking around his neighborhood. Very suspicious activity for a burglar indeed! Not so suspicious for someone who lives there but VERY suspicious for a burglar!
1:13: Now Martin is walking towards the guy on the phone... even more suspicious for a burglar to do.
1:21: Martin is running (as opposed to "skipping" as in the Hannity Interview)
1:55: Even more suspicious. Not only does the Burglar run/skip away. He goes around the car. Stands around. ... I'm thinking Zimmerman just didn't like how he looked or didn't like his face or cloths.
2:47: OBJECTION. Hearsay.
PRE-ANALYSIS 3 OF THE ZIMMERMAN TRIAL
7/2/2013
1. Dramatization looks like it's out of a horror flick. Suspense movie at the very least. I know some white women in the South probably feel that way(I'm half white, I've seen it yes, I'm a tat-a-tale)... but Zimmerman? Males don't stalk single solitary males walking around the neighborhood under street lights and around ones car. That would be stalking.
2. In the dramatization the kid is walking with his hands in his pocket (possibly because walking in a skipping motion with skittles and an ice tea is too cheerful of an image).
3. 1:02: Notice that using proper street lighting it's no longer very dark.
4. At hand in his waistband Trayvon is shown with hands in his pockets. Then with hands by his side. NEVER as it actually was with his skittles and ice tea.
5. 1:42: 'These assholes always get away' Zimmerman. i.e. Now Treyvon is not a single individual but multiple guys.
Possible Goal: Prepare the scene for a murder so he could either
1. Look good to his neighborhood for killing a hoodlum (Mistake: forgot there are blacks in his neighborhood)
OR
2. He wanted to kill for fun and this call gives him the cover of being a "good guy".
6. 2:20 : Still after all the varied movement he's still acting like he thinks this kid is a burglar! (Wow What a crazy story this guy Zimmerman is sketching for us!)
7. Begins to follow Treyvon says "Fuckin Punks". Building the anger and the case on the phone of being the "good guy".
8. 2:28: 'Are you following him? Ok. We don't need you to do that'... Zimmerman says OK and keeps on following him (i.e. possible goal: that's not a part of his plan)
9: 2:40: STILL following him. Count out the seconds. How long is 12 seconds?
10. 3:00: STILL following him after swearing.
11. Probable: He stalked him. Saw him in the distance (it's unlikely Treyvon was stalking him and hit him when he's so obviously talking on the phone and reporting him... HE LIVES RIGHT ACROSS THE STREET... could Zimmerman be jealous over Treyvon's girlfriend? He does have a wife and I've heard that life goes downhill after marriage)... then Zimmerman carried out his intended plan. To bag himself a black kid scalp? What was he counting on? Answer: The Southern Strategy.
PRE-ANALYSIS 4 OF THE ZIMMERMAN TRIAL
7/2/2013
Unanswered Questions:
Note that in his FIRST statement Zimmerman STARTED with his excuse for killing. He hadn't thought out his story in that much detail thus all the discrepancies. Considering that it took months to get an investigation started, he was right. (i.e. Florida has a Stand Alone Law which allows people such as Cheney to shoot people in the face and walk away without an investigation... law came later)
Now watch this video:
Intro: Zimmerman told police that after disappearing behind the houses, Martin came back toward the street, circled Zimmerman’s truck, and then once again headed back toward the houses. Zimmerman said that’s when he thought to get out of his truck and look for a street sign, because he was still on the phone with non-emergency dispatch and wanted to give the dispatcher more information:
1:30 - He answers a question with a pause then without pause. When he says YES it's done forcefully. Video is short. Report is shorter, says "The examinee has told substantially the complete truth" - NOTE: I have covered lie detectors here. That laptop gadget looks kinda outdated to me. I think we should be using more sophisticated lie detectors for cases such as these to lower the chances of a false positive or a false negative. Of course, the video and lie detector results should be available publicly if this is a public trial, which it is. Let the public decide on the lie detector results when they become fully available.
3:30 - Severity of his injuries had cleared up. Look at this screen shot I took of the beginning of the above video it's comeplety consistent with self-inflicted injuries on the sidewalk I hypothesized here,shown below, i.e. he hit his head on the corner a few times till he got blood:
3:30 - Severity of his injuries had cleared up. Look at this screen shot I took of the beginning of the above video it's comeplety consistent with self-inflicted injuries on the sidewalk I hypothesized here,shown below, i.e. he hit his head on the corner a few times till he got blood:
Hypothesis: Maybe he was scared for his life. This could be gang related. Zimmerman does look like he could be that sort of a guy and he definitely doesn't have a voice thick enough to reach that octave. That voice screaming was definitely a black kids voice (given the natural context of this first case - the situation may change after I post this). Zimmerman probably told him before he was going to kill him why he was doing it or something like that, some sort of gang rule or initiation ritual. Then lay him out in a cross. {Occam's razor says that the simplest theory is the most likely one}
On 911 Call:
The admissibility of one of the most critical pieces of potential evidence in the George Zimmerman murder trial remains unresolved. An extended court session Monday evening failed to settle the issue of whether prosecutors will be able to play 911 calls from the night Trayvon Martin was killed. The so-called Frye hearing will resume Wednesday at 4 p.m. ET.
Note: The reason why the lawyers don't want this call admissible is because it pretty much shows an intent to kill. Afterall, it proves he followed Treyvon Martin for a whole minute after being told not to. That's damning evidence. It's that simple.
On 911 Call:
The admissibility of one of the most critical pieces of potential evidence in the George Zimmerman murder trial remains unresolved. An extended court session Monday evening failed to settle the issue of whether prosecutors will be able to play 911 calls from the night Trayvon Martin was killed. The so-called Frye hearing will resume Wednesday at 4 p.m. ET.
Note: The reason why the lawyers don't want this call admissible is because it pretty much shows an intent to kill. Afterall, it proves he followed Treyvon Martin for a whole minute after being told not to. That's damning evidence. It's that simple.
CNN: Could Zimmerman have been aware of the much publicized and debated 'stand your ground' law when he made his decision to stalk Treyvon? (i.e. could he have known about the Stand your Ground law given he had a gun, was a neighborhood watchman, and had made several non-emergency calls before?)
1:30 - Expert & FBI admit gun wasn't processed properly.
“Who is on the top and who is on the bottom does not really matter as much as people try to make it out to be,” attorney Lauren Lake says...
“Who is on the top and who is on the bottom does not really matter as much as people try to make it out to be,” attorney Lauren Lake says...
What makes someone an aggressor?(prosecution is throwing the case)...
On Tuesday’s AC360, CNN’s Anderson Cooper spoke with two witnesses, Mary Cutcher and her roommate Selma Mora Lamilla, who were at the scene of the gated community, The Retreat at Twin Lakes in Sanford, Florida, the night Trayvon Martin was shot to death by George Zimmerman.
“So you heard some sort of whining, some sort of commotion outside?” Cooper asked.
“We were in the kitchen, with the window open and the blinds pulled. So we had complete view from outside,” Cutcher explained.
Cooper asked her what was the first thing she saw.
“By that time, you hear like a shot — like some other noise,” Lamilla described.
“You heard the gunshot?” Cooper interjected.
“Yeah, I run away from my backyard and when I just get into the point of my — like my screen, it stopped me, I look at the person on his knees on top of a body,” Lamilla elaborated.
“So you saw Mr. Zimmerman on top of Trayvon Martin?” Cooper questioned.
“Trayvon, exactly,” Lamilla said.
“When you say on top of, how so?” the CNN anchor pressed.
“Straddling him,” Cutcher replied.
“His legs were straddling him?” Cooper followed up.
“One on each side, on his knees, with his hands on his back. I immediately thought, okay, obviously if it’s the shooter, he would have ran,” Cutcher detailed. “I thought he’s holding the wound, helping the guy taking a pulse, making sure he’s okay. When she called to him three times, everything okay, what’s going on? Each time he looked back, didn’t say anything and then the third time he finally said, ‘just call the police.’”
“But at that time it was so dark,” Lamilla added. “I just saw this person. When she started calling the police, I saw Zimmerman walking with — touching like his hair, like kind of like confused back and forth to the body.”
Lamilla and Cutcher described Zimmerman pacing around the body, following the shooting, and disputed that there was any indication of a fight.
“So you heard some sort of whining, some sort of commotion outside?” Cooper asked.
“We were in the kitchen, with the window open and the blinds pulled. So we had complete view from outside,” Cutcher explained.
Cooper asked her what was the first thing she saw.
“By that time, you hear like a shot — like some other noise,” Lamilla described.
“You heard the gunshot?” Cooper interjected.
“Yeah, I run away from my backyard and when I just get into the point of my — like my screen, it stopped me, I look at the person on his knees on top of a body,” Lamilla elaborated.
“So you saw Mr. Zimmerman on top of Trayvon Martin?” Cooper questioned.
“Trayvon, exactly,” Lamilla said.
“When you say on top of, how so?” the CNN anchor pressed.
“Straddling him,” Cutcher replied.
“His legs were straddling him?” Cooper followed up.
“One on each side, on his knees, with his hands on his back. I immediately thought, okay, obviously if it’s the shooter, he would have ran,” Cutcher detailed. “I thought he’s holding the wound, helping the guy taking a pulse, making sure he’s okay. When she called to him three times, everything okay, what’s going on? Each time he looked back, didn’t say anything and then the third time he finally said, ‘just call the police.’”
“But at that time it was so dark,” Lamilla added. “I just saw this person. When she started calling the police, I saw Zimmerman walking with — touching like his hair, like kind of like confused back and forth to the body.”
Lamilla and Cutcher described Zimmerman pacing around the body, following the shooting, and disputed that there was any indication of a fight.
This Is MOST Likely What Happened: He attacked Treyvon who happened to be a football player who punched him. Then he pulled out his gun and while Treyvon was screaming he threatened then killed him (if that's Trayvon Martin's voice, which it is, obviously but if not there are video clips below proving the prosecution's story. Zimmerman's family can't be blamed for lying but Zimmerman can)
Zimmerman was the one doing the threatening and the Stand Your Ground law will not apply for him, since he knew about it and used it while threatening Trayvon before killing him out of rage and/or hate. Then Zimmerman hit his head on the side of the sidewalk, badly. This story FITS the facts.
After Treyvon got shot he stopped screaming. Like in the Matrix. When Trinity got shot she stopped shooting. Same principle, i.e. getting shot shocks the body and so it stops doing whatever it was doing. If the prosecution had used the following clip they might even have won the case as most people seem to see life as a movie. Here are some clips so you can see what happens when Trinity gets shot (i.e. the same thing that happens in real life, you stop doing whatever you were doing - i.e. Trayvon was screaming TILL he got shot.) The prosecution was right. They just didn't prove their case properly.
Matrix-Trinity: Sample 1
Matrix-Trinity: Sample 2
Matrix-Trinity: Sample 3
What Prosecution Said: While Zimmerman says he reached for his gun after the 17-year-old started beating him up, prosecutors believe Zimmerman pointed his gun sooner and that Martin was shouting for help because he saw it.
Evidence of what happens in a shooting is in the well researched fictional videos above. Just the first example of the Prosecution telling the truth. Problem? They are in Florida. GOP Territory.
STAND YOUR GROUND LAW HAS INCREASED THE MURDER RATE IN EVERY STATE IT HAS BEEN IMPLEMENTED IN
The Stand Your Ground Law has led to more killings (& Vigilante Justice) Whether it was justified or not doesn't matter anymore as ALL anyone has to say to kill ANYONE is that they felt threatened. You can literally walk up to a car and shoot everyone and claim self-defense! Here are the images that explain this new crazy Bush Law (probably started when Cheney shot his new acquaintance in the face):
Notice above that "Justifiable Homicides" have increased. This increase involves hunting and shooting people down without warning like some sort of sick Super-Hero. Now notice the path walked by Zimmerman & Trayvon Martin and you will notice that Zimmerman STALKED that kid
Note: Even if he wasn't told NOT to pursue the kid which he refused he would still be guilty of stalking a kid with malicious intent.
Note: Even if he wasn't told NOT to pursue the kid which he refused he would still be guilty of stalking a kid with malicious intent.
Just imagine Trayvon as a white kid to gain some perspective if you are a Fox News watcher Trayvon was in a white gated community. Many white kids get in exactly the kind of trouble Trayvon has gotten into in his past. This could easily have happened to a white kid ... as stalking and killing without any justification is legal now in Florida.
George Zimmerman's Character as a continuous profile (& thus racist!):
Zimmerman verdict: A green light for racist vigilantes
This verdict allows every paranoid, sub-intelligent, vigilante with a gun to go on victimizing black youth
Just weeks ago, I returned to New York City from Fire Island on a Sunday evening, and decided to stop by my office.
After I let myself into the office, I noticed some Caucasians mingling around. I paid them no mind, since our office often has off-hours visitors who rent the common space.
“Can I help you?” said a middle aged white man, testily.
“No,” I shot back. “But I can I help YOU?”
“What do you mean?”
“I work here,” I said. “This is MY office.”
“Oh,” he said, stepping back slightly. “I saw you and just wanted to make sure things are OK.”
“Thank you, George Zimmerman,” I said.
Weeks later, my sarcastic one-off is more painful to me than I could ever have imagined. George Zimmerman’s acquittal leaves me feeling so nauseous.
This office exchange has been common to me my whole life. A testy “Can I help you?” doubles as a passive-aggressive demand for me to justify my presence even where I belong. Thankfully, I have never encountered an armed white person on the other end of that presumption.
Trayvon Martin paid for that common presumption with his life.
Zimmerman verdict: A green light for racist vigilantes
This verdict allows every paranoid, sub-intelligent, vigilante with a gun to go on victimizing black youth
Just weeks ago, I returned to New York City from Fire Island on a Sunday evening, and decided to stop by my office.
After I let myself into the office, I noticed some Caucasians mingling around. I paid them no mind, since our office often has off-hours visitors who rent the common space.
“Can I help you?” said a middle aged white man, testily.
“No,” I shot back. “But I can I help YOU?”
“What do you mean?”
“I work here,” I said. “This is MY office.”
“Oh,” he said, stepping back slightly. “I saw you and just wanted to make sure things are OK.”
“Thank you, George Zimmerman,” I said.
Weeks later, my sarcastic one-off is more painful to me than I could ever have imagined. George Zimmerman’s acquittal leaves me feeling so nauseous.
This office exchange has been common to me my whole life. A testy “Can I help you?” doubles as a passive-aggressive demand for me to justify my presence even where I belong. Thankfully, I have never encountered an armed white person on the other end of that presumption.
Trayvon Martin paid for that common presumption with his life.
ARTICLES USEFUL FOR A PROPER PERSPECTIVE
Zimmerman saga was all about race
Let's get real
Because it happened in America, the trial of George Zimmerman for shooting and killing Trayvon Martin was all about race. And because it happened in America, the people who benefit politically from the same invidious forces that led both to Trayvon Martin’s killing, and the acquittal of his killer, will deny that race had anything to do with either the killing or the verdict.
Suppose Trayvon Martin had been a 230-pound 30-year-old black man, with a loaded gun in his jacket. Suppose Zimmerman had been a 150-pound 17-year-old white kid, who was doing nothing more threatening than walking back from a convenience store to his father’s condo.
Suppose Martin had stalked Zimmerman in his car, until Zimmerman became afraid and tried to elude him. Suppose Martin had gotten out of his car and pursued Zimmerman. Suppose this led to some sort of altercation in which the big scary black man ended up with a bloody nose and some scratches on the back of his head, and the scared skinny (and unarmed) white kid had ended up with a bullet in his heart.
How do you suppose the big scary black man’s claim of “self-defense” would have gone over with a jury made up almost entirely of white women? But of course this is America, which means that the scary figure in this story is the skinny unarmed teenager, because in America pretty much any black male over the age of 12 in this sort of situation is going to be presumed to be the ”aggressor,” the “thug” – in short,” the real criminal,” until he’s proved innocent, which he won’t be, even if he’s now a dead, still unarmed teenager. And his killer is a grown man who provokes a fight with an otherwise harmless kid, starts losing it, and then shoots the kid dead.
Because this is America, pointing out that a black boy can be shot with impunity by a more or less white man because many white Americans are terrified by black boys and men is called “playing the race card.” The race card is what the people who benefit politically from the fact that many white Americans are terrified by black boys and men call any reference to the fact that race continues to play an overwhelmingly important, and overwhelmingly invidious, role in American culture in general. And in the criminal justice system in particular.
Trayvon Martin was stalked by George Zimmerman because he was black. Trayvon Martin is dead because he was black. George Zimmerman was acquitted of killing Trayvon Martin because the boy Zimmerman killed was black.
If you deny these things, you are either a liar or an idiot, or possibly both.
Nothing above requires the conclusion that the jury’s verdict was wrong as a matter of law. Florida’s laws, in their majestic equality, extend to people of all races the right to engage in vigilante killing that eliminates the sole witness to that killing. To point this out is neither a defense of those laws, nor a claim that they will in fact be applied equally. In other words, to blame this jury in this situation is to miss the point.
Let's get real
Because it happened in America, the trial of George Zimmerman for shooting and killing Trayvon Martin was all about race. And because it happened in America, the people who benefit politically from the same invidious forces that led both to Trayvon Martin’s killing, and the acquittal of his killer, will deny that race had anything to do with either the killing or the verdict.
Suppose Trayvon Martin had been a 230-pound 30-year-old black man, with a loaded gun in his jacket. Suppose Zimmerman had been a 150-pound 17-year-old white kid, who was doing nothing more threatening than walking back from a convenience store to his father’s condo.
Suppose Martin had stalked Zimmerman in his car, until Zimmerman became afraid and tried to elude him. Suppose Martin had gotten out of his car and pursued Zimmerman. Suppose this led to some sort of altercation in which the big scary black man ended up with a bloody nose and some scratches on the back of his head, and the scared skinny (and unarmed) white kid had ended up with a bullet in his heart.
How do you suppose the big scary black man’s claim of “self-defense” would have gone over with a jury made up almost entirely of white women? But of course this is America, which means that the scary figure in this story is the skinny unarmed teenager, because in America pretty much any black male over the age of 12 in this sort of situation is going to be presumed to be the ”aggressor,” the “thug” – in short,” the real criminal,” until he’s proved innocent, which he won’t be, even if he’s now a dead, still unarmed teenager. And his killer is a grown man who provokes a fight with an otherwise harmless kid, starts losing it, and then shoots the kid dead.
Because this is America, pointing out that a black boy can be shot with impunity by a more or less white man because many white Americans are terrified by black boys and men is called “playing the race card.” The race card is what the people who benefit politically from the fact that many white Americans are terrified by black boys and men call any reference to the fact that race continues to play an overwhelmingly important, and overwhelmingly invidious, role in American culture in general. And in the criminal justice system in particular.
Trayvon Martin was stalked by George Zimmerman because he was black. Trayvon Martin is dead because he was black. George Zimmerman was acquitted of killing Trayvon Martin because the boy Zimmerman killed was black.
If you deny these things, you are either a liar or an idiot, or possibly both.
Nothing above requires the conclusion that the jury’s verdict was wrong as a matter of law. Florida’s laws, in their majestic equality, extend to people of all races the right to engage in vigilante killing that eliminates the sole witness to that killing. To point this out is neither a defense of those laws, nor a claim that they will in fact be applied equally. In other words, to blame this jury in this situation is to miss the point.
George Zimmerman's Character as a continuos profiler:
Zimmerman verdict: A green light for racist vigilantes
This verdict allows every paranoid, sub-intelligent, vigilante with a gun to go on victimizing black youth
Just weeks ago, I returned to New York City from Fire Island on a Sunday evening, and decided to stop by my office.
After I let myself into the office, I noticed some Caucasians mingling around. I paid them no mind, since our office often has off-hours visitors who rent the common space.
“Can I help you?” said a middle aged white man, testily.
“No,” I shot back. “But I can I help YOU?”
“What do you mean?”
“I work here,” I said. “This is MY office.”
“Oh,” he said, stepping back slightly. “I saw you and just wanted to make sure things are OK.”
“Thank you, George Zimmerman,” I said.
Weeks later, my sarcastic one-off is more painful to me than I could ever have imagined. George Zimmerman’s acquittal leaves me feeling so nauseous.
This office exchange has been common to me my whole life. A testy “Can I help you?” doubles as a passive-aggressive demand for me to justify my presence even where I belong. Thankfully, I have never encountered an armed white person on the other end of that presumption.
Trayvon Martin paid for that common presumption with his life.
Zimmerman’s stooges and apologists claim that his deadly encounter had nothing do with race. And that his trial and acquittal have nothing to do with race. His defenders effectively portrayed him as a hapless Samaritan who got in over his head. Meanwhile, they tarred Trayvon as a menace who failed to properly justify his existence.
These presumptions colored every moment of the Police Department’s botched initial reaction and the trial.
How does an armed adult defy the policy, chase down a youth, kill him, and then turn around and call it self defense? Defense from what? A fleeing kid? Was Trayvon Martin seen for his humanity? Or as a “fucking punk”? Are black men seen for our humanity or as three-fifths of a fucking punk? This verdict will have devastating consequences. It is an implicit green light for every paranoid, sub-intelligent, vigilante racist to go on victimizing black youth. Trayvon Martin is dead for no reason other than being black.
Why do Zimmerman and some Americans feel entitled to police black and brown people like vigilantes? Why did the Sanford Police Department test a dead boy’s body for drugs in “standard operating procedure,” yet failed to test a live man’s body for alcohol or drugs? Why did the Sanford Police Department fail so miserably during the critical immediate hours after arriving on the scene?
Since our juridical Establishment often turns its head – or even winks – at the prevalence of racial profiling and police brutality against black and brown people, why should anyone be surprised by Zimmerman’s chase? Or by his acquittal? Implicitly and explicitly, the law condones his racial paranoia. The so-called rationales used to design and peddle “Stand Your Ground” laws and “Stop and Frisk” laws, and immigrant policing laws, fuel a vigilante mentality allowing some Americans to feel entitled to self-police others.
Even before the verdict, the Police Establishment warned black people not to riot – as though that were a foregone conclusion – without delivering Zimmerman’s supporters the same warning. The warning not to riot – in its substance and tone – recirculates the dogma of “black men as menace.” The chase, the trial, the warnings not to riot, the acquittal all compound the passive-aggressive profiling of black and brown people.
And yet. Legions of white people are heartbroken by Trayvon’s death, and Zimmerman’s acquittal. Legions of white people do not make it their business to self-police people of color. Many people of all races feel solidarity with the boy. “We are all Trayvon.”
This sordid affair has everything to do with race, but not race alone.
Not just a cautionary tale on racial profiling and vigilante justice, Trayvon’s needless death is a devastating lesson on the paranoid logic of gun capitalism. Zimmerman claims he didn’t feel safe. Did Trayvon feel safe? What about his safety? After all, the youth was shot by a multi-racial vigilante assailant – with a troubling history with law enforcement — in a multiracial gated community.
When will we muster the resolve to stop deaths from gun violence? For goodness sake: Why wouldn’t the Aurora shooting and the Newtown massacre force us all to confront the illusory sense of safety in our communities?
Regeneration Through Violence, The Fatal Environment, Gunfighter Nation: Richard Slotkin’s masterful historical trilogy on this country’s long-standing love affair with vigilantism, cruelty, and gun violence reveals as much about Zimmerman and this tragedy as does his trial transcripts – or any news media. This tragedy rips bare all the thorny issues Richard Slotkin exposes in that brilliant trilogy.
The questions demand: How does a legal establishment maintain justice in a world getting browner by the day? And in a nation that feels the need to “regenerate” itself through violence? What will this country do to keep young people safe?
Slotkin trilogy shows us how America’s frontier myths still dominate our violent politics and culture. So, in painful ways, the man who occupies the Oval Office, in all his blackness, is irrelevant.
From the highest levels of power designing our drone policy to the inept local trenches of Florida policing, we remain a gunfighter nation. From Trayvon to the kids in Newton, young people are vulnerable to mentally ill or paranoid or racist adults with guns. The acquittal is yet another frank reminder of who writes our laws, who enforces our laws, and the very presumptions guiding our laws.
Zimmerman’s acquittal is a blunt reality check about how power works in America.
Zimmerman verdict: A green light for racist vigilantes
This verdict allows every paranoid, sub-intelligent, vigilante with a gun to go on victimizing black youth
Just weeks ago, I returned to New York City from Fire Island on a Sunday evening, and decided to stop by my office.
After I let myself into the office, I noticed some Caucasians mingling around. I paid them no mind, since our office often has off-hours visitors who rent the common space.
“Can I help you?” said a middle aged white man, testily.
“No,” I shot back. “But I can I help YOU?”
“What do you mean?”
“I work here,” I said. “This is MY office.”
“Oh,” he said, stepping back slightly. “I saw you and just wanted to make sure things are OK.”
“Thank you, George Zimmerman,” I said.
Weeks later, my sarcastic one-off is more painful to me than I could ever have imagined. George Zimmerman’s acquittal leaves me feeling so nauseous.
This office exchange has been common to me my whole life. A testy “Can I help you?” doubles as a passive-aggressive demand for me to justify my presence even where I belong. Thankfully, I have never encountered an armed white person on the other end of that presumption.
Trayvon Martin paid for that common presumption with his life.
Zimmerman’s stooges and apologists claim that his deadly encounter had nothing do with race. And that his trial and acquittal have nothing to do with race. His defenders effectively portrayed him as a hapless Samaritan who got in over his head. Meanwhile, they tarred Trayvon as a menace who failed to properly justify his existence.
These presumptions colored every moment of the Police Department’s botched initial reaction and the trial.
How does an armed adult defy the policy, chase down a youth, kill him, and then turn around and call it self defense? Defense from what? A fleeing kid? Was Trayvon Martin seen for his humanity? Or as a “fucking punk”? Are black men seen for our humanity or as three-fifths of a fucking punk? This verdict will have devastating consequences. It is an implicit green light for every paranoid, sub-intelligent, vigilante racist to go on victimizing black youth. Trayvon Martin is dead for no reason other than being black.
Why do Zimmerman and some Americans feel entitled to police black and brown people like vigilantes? Why did the Sanford Police Department test a dead boy’s body for drugs in “standard operating procedure,” yet failed to test a live man’s body for alcohol or drugs? Why did the Sanford Police Department fail so miserably during the critical immediate hours after arriving on the scene?
Since our juridical Establishment often turns its head – or even winks – at the prevalence of racial profiling and police brutality against black and brown people, why should anyone be surprised by Zimmerman’s chase? Or by his acquittal? Implicitly and explicitly, the law condones his racial paranoia. The so-called rationales used to design and peddle “Stand Your Ground” laws and “Stop and Frisk” laws, and immigrant policing laws, fuel a vigilante mentality allowing some Americans to feel entitled to self-police others.
Even before the verdict, the Police Establishment warned black people not to riot – as though that were a foregone conclusion – without delivering Zimmerman’s supporters the same warning. The warning not to riot – in its substance and tone – recirculates the dogma of “black men as menace.” The chase, the trial, the warnings not to riot, the acquittal all compound the passive-aggressive profiling of black and brown people.
And yet. Legions of white people are heartbroken by Trayvon’s death, and Zimmerman’s acquittal. Legions of white people do not make it their business to self-police people of color. Many people of all races feel solidarity with the boy. “We are all Trayvon.”
This sordid affair has everything to do with race, but not race alone.
Not just a cautionary tale on racial profiling and vigilante justice, Trayvon’s needless death is a devastating lesson on the paranoid logic of gun capitalism. Zimmerman claims he didn’t feel safe. Did Trayvon feel safe? What about his safety? After all, the youth was shot by a multi-racial vigilante assailant – with a troubling history with law enforcement — in a multiracial gated community.
When will we muster the resolve to stop deaths from gun violence? For goodness sake: Why wouldn’t the Aurora shooting and the Newtown massacre force us all to confront the illusory sense of safety in our communities?
Regeneration Through Violence, The Fatal Environment, Gunfighter Nation: Richard Slotkin’s masterful historical trilogy on this country’s long-standing love affair with vigilantism, cruelty, and gun violence reveals as much about Zimmerman and this tragedy as does his trial transcripts – or any news media. This tragedy rips bare all the thorny issues Richard Slotkin exposes in that brilliant trilogy.
The questions demand: How does a legal establishment maintain justice in a world getting browner by the day? And in a nation that feels the need to “regenerate” itself through violence? What will this country do to keep young people safe?
Slotkin trilogy shows us how America’s frontier myths still dominate our violent politics and culture. So, in painful ways, the man who occupies the Oval Office, in all his blackness, is irrelevant.
From the highest levels of power designing our drone policy to the inept local trenches of Florida policing, we remain a gunfighter nation. From Trayvon to the kids in Newton, young people are vulnerable to mentally ill or paranoid or racist adults with guns. The acquittal is yet another frank reminder of who writes our laws, who enforces our laws, and the very presumptions guiding our laws.
Zimmerman’s acquittal is a blunt reality check about how power works in America.
Our real problem is white rage
For all the warnings about supposed black riots, don't forget who exploded throughout the George Zimmerman affair
If there is no justice, there can be no peace. But in the American South it seems white folks suddenly believe that decorum and charm are a proper response to unspeakable acts of violence and unconscionable injustice.
The day before a jury delivered an acquittal in the murder trial of George Zimmerman, Seminole County Sheriff Don Eslinger and Sanford Police Chief Cecil Smith gave a national press conference to appeal for a peaceful reaction to the verdict — regardless of its outcome.
Eslinger, who is white, said, “We will not tolerate anyone who uses this verdict as an excuse to violate the law.”
The veiled threat of an aggressive police response to imaginary civil unrest belies the very logic that led to Trayvon Martin’s death to begin with. For, you see, African-Americans are never protected or served by the law enforcement apparatus — yet they are always subject to its military might.
Sanford police coyly “tolerated” the actual killing of an unarmed black child, but yet refuse to “tolerate” any anger expressed for the acquittal of his murderer.
This is the new Jim Crow realized.
It bears reminding that it was Sanford’s police who first allowed Zimmerman to walk away uncharged — his gun in tote. The story of self-defense seemed logical to them given the brown body lying on the ground. It was their decision not to investigate the case as a crime that led to public outcry, rallies and marches. It is only because of their total failure to do their jobs that the world now knows the name and face of Trayvon Martin.
The complete incompetence (or indifference) of Sanford police is why certain evidence that could have more easily convicted Zimmerman was inadmissible at trial — the most glaring example being their failure to perform a toxicology test on Zimmerman the night he shot Martin. Had they done so, it would have revealed whether he was under the influence of either illegal substances, alcohol or the two prescriptions drugs he had admittedly been taking — Temazepan and Adderall — the side effects of which include hallucinations, insomnia and aggressive behavior.
Instead, Sanford police let Zimmerman walk away, quietly into the night, as he did again yesterday. But the same police now threaten a quick and forcible response to any violence perpetrated in reaction to injustice their own department has engendered.
This arrogant call to remain calm in the face of such fatal injustice reveals a basic disregard for the humanity of black people. It is this fundamental disconnect — an unwillingness or inability to see African-Americans as fully realized human beings — that allows whites to blindly ignore the need for equal treatment and equal justice.
It is this warped mentality that led George Zimmerman to murder an unarmed child, feel no remorse and say it was “God’s plan.”
Human beings are allowed to be angry. They are allowed to emote fear, love, joy, relief, pride and pain. Perhaps if the white women on this jury could see a murdered child — as opposed to a “black” child — they would instinctively know that Trayvon was afraid of Zimmerman, confused by this man following him in the dark, and perhaps they could intuit Trayvon screaming for his life. There is, after all, no other way to see the facts of this case — beyond a reasonable doubt or otherwise.
But neither justice nor humanity are colorblind in the eyes of American law. The nation’s sociopolitical consciousness remains plagued by a three-fifths compromise that devalues the lives of black people in general, and black boys and men in particular.
And when the criminal justice system — in the hands, as it was, of two white defense attorneys, two white prosecutors and a mostly white jury presided over by a white judge — choose to disregard the life of an innocent black teenager, it can hardly be a surprising result. Trayvon Martin was profiled not just by Zimmerman on the night he was killed, but by the very people charged with adjudicating justice on behalf of his senseless death.
For African-Americans this is not new. The paradox of being implicitly excluded from the guarantee of life, liberty and pursuit of happiness has been reiterated and reinforced by public policy and social malaise for centuries. President Barack Obama is not immune — as he’s become the target of incessant “white rage”: race-baiting attacks, prejudice and bias even prior to his election. The Republican Party and its neo-Confederate Tea Party wing has been committed to invalidating his political and legislative legacy as much as the Zimmerman jury invalidated the civil rights of Trayvon. The disparate precedent set, therefore, becomes all the more insulting when we’re told to simply shut up and bear it.
Melissa Harris-Perry, on her eponymous MSNBC show, explained this weekend that “race riots” is a biased term that dismisses the underlying calls for justice, which are often the primary purpose for protests by black and brown people. She highlighted the key fact that in America’s history the worst “race riots” featured violent attacks perpetrated by whites against blacks: The Tulsa race riot of 1921 and the Rosewood, Fla., riots of 1923.
In Tulsa, a mob of armed white men charged into a black neighborhood, burning homes, killing over 300 victims and leaving an estimated 8,000 people homeless. In Rosewood, a series of lynchings escalated into hundreds of angry white rioters killing an unknown number of black citizens and leaving the entire town in waste.
Yet white rage is never articulated by America’s law enforcement as a reason to fear or strategically organize against. White males aren’t stopped by police in disproportionate numbers nor frisked before entering movie theaters and first-grade classrooms. But there are many angry white people out there.
The image of a threatening black male prevails in the minds of white prosecutors, juries and average citizens alike — and the Zimmerman verdict will only serve to solidify that concept and embolden like-minded vigilantes to behave recklessly and act with impunity against the lives, bodies and souls of black folks.
African-American civil rights leaders, politicians and religious authorities have all echoed the call for calm in the wake of the verdict. But what is most confounding is the fact that a black male who chooses to riot is as likely to be met with violent and deadly force as if he were walking quietly home with Skittles and iced tea in-hand. This is the ultimate tragedy that Zimmerman’s trial has unleashed in the so-called “post-racial” age.
Black males, regardless of age, environment, lack of criminal record, activity and intent are treated as suspects, never presumed innocent. Their lives are reduced to a cautionary tale — denied of due process and equal protection.
What words written here can suffice to argue on behalf of an innocent dead child, as his murderer walks free — absolved by the system that failed to hold him responsible from the very beginning? The very logic that precipitated Trayvon’s death and rendered jurisprudence to justify his killing reflects the misguided principles at the heart of Zimmerman’s defense: that this black boy had no right to live.
How is this possible 60 years after Emmett Till’s fatal demise? What progress can be gleaned from Obama’s ascendance if black children can’t be judged by the content of their character, instead of the color of their skin?
Trayvon Martin, and all of us by proxy, has been weighed in the balances and found guilty of his own murder. The sentence is death without parole.
For all the warnings about supposed black riots, don't forget who exploded throughout the George Zimmerman affair
If there is no justice, there can be no peace. But in the American South it seems white folks suddenly believe that decorum and charm are a proper response to unspeakable acts of violence and unconscionable injustice.
The day before a jury delivered an acquittal in the murder trial of George Zimmerman, Seminole County Sheriff Don Eslinger and Sanford Police Chief Cecil Smith gave a national press conference to appeal for a peaceful reaction to the verdict — regardless of its outcome.
Eslinger, who is white, said, “We will not tolerate anyone who uses this verdict as an excuse to violate the law.”
The veiled threat of an aggressive police response to imaginary civil unrest belies the very logic that led to Trayvon Martin’s death to begin with. For, you see, African-Americans are never protected or served by the law enforcement apparatus — yet they are always subject to its military might.
Sanford police coyly “tolerated” the actual killing of an unarmed black child, but yet refuse to “tolerate” any anger expressed for the acquittal of his murderer.
This is the new Jim Crow realized.
It bears reminding that it was Sanford’s police who first allowed Zimmerman to walk away uncharged — his gun in tote. The story of self-defense seemed logical to them given the brown body lying on the ground. It was their decision not to investigate the case as a crime that led to public outcry, rallies and marches. It is only because of their total failure to do their jobs that the world now knows the name and face of Trayvon Martin.
The complete incompetence (or indifference) of Sanford police is why certain evidence that could have more easily convicted Zimmerman was inadmissible at trial — the most glaring example being their failure to perform a toxicology test on Zimmerman the night he shot Martin. Had they done so, it would have revealed whether he was under the influence of either illegal substances, alcohol or the two prescriptions drugs he had admittedly been taking — Temazepan and Adderall — the side effects of which include hallucinations, insomnia and aggressive behavior.
Instead, Sanford police let Zimmerman walk away, quietly into the night, as he did again yesterday. But the same police now threaten a quick and forcible response to any violence perpetrated in reaction to injustice their own department has engendered.
This arrogant call to remain calm in the face of such fatal injustice reveals a basic disregard for the humanity of black people. It is this fundamental disconnect — an unwillingness or inability to see African-Americans as fully realized human beings — that allows whites to blindly ignore the need for equal treatment and equal justice.
It is this warped mentality that led George Zimmerman to murder an unarmed child, feel no remorse and say it was “God’s plan.”
Human beings are allowed to be angry. They are allowed to emote fear, love, joy, relief, pride and pain. Perhaps if the white women on this jury could see a murdered child — as opposed to a “black” child — they would instinctively know that Trayvon was afraid of Zimmerman, confused by this man following him in the dark, and perhaps they could intuit Trayvon screaming for his life. There is, after all, no other way to see the facts of this case — beyond a reasonable doubt or otherwise.
But neither justice nor humanity are colorblind in the eyes of American law. The nation’s sociopolitical consciousness remains plagued by a three-fifths compromise that devalues the lives of black people in general, and black boys and men in particular.
And when the criminal justice system — in the hands, as it was, of two white defense attorneys, two white prosecutors and a mostly white jury presided over by a white judge — choose to disregard the life of an innocent black teenager, it can hardly be a surprising result. Trayvon Martin was profiled not just by Zimmerman on the night he was killed, but by the very people charged with adjudicating justice on behalf of his senseless death.
For African-Americans this is not new. The paradox of being implicitly excluded from the guarantee of life, liberty and pursuit of happiness has been reiterated and reinforced by public policy and social malaise for centuries. President Barack Obama is not immune — as he’s become the target of incessant “white rage”: race-baiting attacks, prejudice and bias even prior to his election. The Republican Party and its neo-Confederate Tea Party wing has been committed to invalidating his political and legislative legacy as much as the Zimmerman jury invalidated the civil rights of Trayvon. The disparate precedent set, therefore, becomes all the more insulting when we’re told to simply shut up and bear it.
Melissa Harris-Perry, on her eponymous MSNBC show, explained this weekend that “race riots” is a biased term that dismisses the underlying calls for justice, which are often the primary purpose for protests by black and brown people. She highlighted the key fact that in America’s history the worst “race riots” featured violent attacks perpetrated by whites against blacks: The Tulsa race riot of 1921 and the Rosewood, Fla., riots of 1923.
In Tulsa, a mob of armed white men charged into a black neighborhood, burning homes, killing over 300 victims and leaving an estimated 8,000 people homeless. In Rosewood, a series of lynchings escalated into hundreds of angry white rioters killing an unknown number of black citizens and leaving the entire town in waste.
Yet white rage is never articulated by America’s law enforcement as a reason to fear or strategically organize against. White males aren’t stopped by police in disproportionate numbers nor frisked before entering movie theaters and first-grade classrooms. But there are many angry white people out there.
The image of a threatening black male prevails in the minds of white prosecutors, juries and average citizens alike — and the Zimmerman verdict will only serve to solidify that concept and embolden like-minded vigilantes to behave recklessly and act with impunity against the lives, bodies and souls of black folks.
African-American civil rights leaders, politicians and religious authorities have all echoed the call for calm in the wake of the verdict. But what is most confounding is the fact that a black male who chooses to riot is as likely to be met with violent and deadly force as if he were walking quietly home with Skittles and iced tea in-hand. This is the ultimate tragedy that Zimmerman’s trial has unleashed in the so-called “post-racial” age.
Black males, regardless of age, environment, lack of criminal record, activity and intent are treated as suspects, never presumed innocent. Their lives are reduced to a cautionary tale — denied of due process and equal protection.
What words written here can suffice to argue on behalf of an innocent dead child, as his murderer walks free — absolved by the system that failed to hold him responsible from the very beginning? The very logic that precipitated Trayvon’s death and rendered jurisprudence to justify his killing reflects the misguided principles at the heart of Zimmerman’s defense: that this black boy had no right to live.
How is this possible 60 years after Emmett Till’s fatal demise? What progress can be gleaned from Obama’s ascendance if black children can’t be judged by the content of their character, instead of the color of their skin?
Trayvon Martin, and all of us by proxy, has been weighed in the balances and found guilty of his own murder. The sentence is death without parole.
Background Overviews important For Understanding The Zimmerman Murder Case:
Background Article 1: Five things you should know about the Trayvon Martin case
Background Article 2: Why Rush Limbaugh and the right turned on Trayvon Martin
Background Article 1: Five things you should know about the Trayvon Martin case
Background Article 2: Why Rush Limbaugh and the right turned on Trayvon Martin
Fox News Hypnosis
Hannity Makes A Stand In A "Non Racial" Way (The race reversal tactics is used here):
Demonizing Trayvon: Racist Editorializing With Graphics On Fox News
Demonizing Trayvon: Racist Editorializing With Graphics On Fox News
George Zimmerman & Racial Tensions
George Zimmerman goes back on neighborhood watch, and President Obama talks about the black experience in America. (02:32):
George Zimmerman goes back on neighborhood watch, and President Obama talks about the black experience in America. (02:32):
MOMENT OF ZEN
"CONSERVATIVE" RHETORIC: IF YOU WISH ZIMMERMAN WAS IN JAIL THAT MEANS YOU WANT THAT FAMILY TO BURN IN IT'S CAR, WHO'S THE MONSTER NOW?
The Word - Color-bind
President Obama takes the first step in racial dialogue by discussing how it feels to be in a room full of white people who are scared of him. (04:53):
President Obama takes the first step in racial dialogue by discussing how it feels to be in a room full of white people who are scared of him. (04:53):
NOTES:
"FEAR OF BLACK PEOPLE" JOKE:
BLACK PEOPLE R SCARY:
THE TV ALSO PROVED THAT BLACK PEOPLE ARE SCARY...
RELATED?
USING THE USUAL GOP "FUZZY MATH":
JOKE ABOUT THE GOP'S & FOX NEWS TENDENCY TO UNDER-HIGHLIGHT WHITE CRIMES AND STRETCH ONE BLACK PERSONS CRIME TO ALL BLACK PEOPLE:
PROFILING HAS BECOME A WAY OF LIFE IN MANY CITIES NOW...
TACTIC BEING USED BY FOX NEWS ON BLACK PEOPLE & LIBERALS:
Tip/Wag - Non-Rioting Black People & Fox News
Crowds gather to peacefully protest George Zimmerman's acquittal, and Elisabeth Hasselbeck joins Fox & Friends. (05:07):
Crowds gather to peacefully protest George Zimmerman's acquittal, and Elisabeth Hasselbeck joins Fox & Friends. (05:07):
Notes:
Then Fox News Tried To Start Race Riots!
Article: Fox News Incites Race Riots: Creates Trayvon Martin Controversy From Unrelated Crime
Then Fox News Tried To Start Race Riots!
Article: Fox News Incites Race Riots: Creates Trayvon Martin Controversy From Unrelated Crime
FOX NEWS WASN'T THE ONLY ONE EXPECTING RIOTS. (ONE OF THE INSTANCES WHEN MEDIA SUDDENLY BECAME CONSISTENT IN AN INTERESTING WAY)
PIERS MORGAN SEEMED TO JOIN IN AS WELL AND MANAGED TO AVOID ANY SCRUTINY EVEN FROM BLACKS. VERY GOOD ANCHORINGMETHINKS. RIOTS BECAME A PER-ORDAINED FACT. APPARENTLYMEDIA NO LONGER HAS AN EFFECT ON PUBLIC OPINION AS IN OUR GRANDPARENTS TIME.
BILL O'REILLY TRIED TO GET SOME SORT OF RIOT GOING BUT DOESN'T SEEM TO UNDERSTAND THE KIDS ARN'T AS RACIST AS OLD PEOPLE. HE'S A DINOSAUR ON HIS WAY OUT. HE HAS NOTHING TO LOSE THUS HIS OBVIOUS SUPPORT FOR THE VOTING FRAUD TACTICS WHICH ARE BEING PREPARED FOR THE FUTURE AND HAVE ALREADY BEEN USED IN THE GOP PRIMARY. IT'S NO BIG DEAL ANYMORE. JUST A PART OF EVERYDAY SHOWMANSHIP.
BILL O'REILLY DIDN'T GET THE RIOT HE WANTED. HIS BASE IS WAY TO OLD TO GO OUT A RIOT.
STEPHEN COLBERT ACTING OUT WHAT BILL O'REILLY MUST HAVE OBVIOUSLY FELT, IF JUST FOR BEING WRONG. :)
HE GAINED WEIGHT TO LOOK LIKE A JOLLY GUY TO GET A SYMPATHY VOTE FROM THE ALL FEMALE JURY BECAUSE FAT GUYS ARE SEEN BY WOMEN AS LESS THRETENING! 50% OF AMERICA AWARE OF THE CASE KNOWS THIS.
WITH HIS REPUTATION HE MIGHT AS WELL DRESS AS THE GUY HE PROFILED! :)
FOX NEWS IS MOVING AROUND IT'S PRIME-TIME WOMEN. YOU KNOW THESE ARE THE MAIN RUPERT MURDOCH BLONDES AS THEY HAVE THE SAME HAIRCUT (WOMEN SEEM RANKED IN HAIRCUTS WITH THE LONGEST HAIRED WOMEN WITH THE LOWEST STATUS).
AFRAID OF THE SAME PROTECTIONS OF THE "STAND YOUR GROUND LAW" BEING USED AGAINST HIS BROTHER (I.E. THE VIGILANTISM THAT ZIMMERMAN ENGAGE IN). NO AWARENESS OR NO SHAME. IRONICALLY,A BLACK WOMAN JUST SHOT IN THE AIR, AS PER THE BIDEN DEFENSE, AND SHE WAS THROWN IN JAIL. APPARENTLY, THAT'S NOT RACIST EITHER.
"This is a victory for Rule of Law. In that Florida doesn't have rules or law." Colbert Report - RelatedStand Your Ground Law... Not to be confused with Gun Free Zones.
Geraldo thinks that the women would have shot the kid sooner if they were stalking a kid and then threatening him with a gun making him scream and then killing him. Geraldo is a piece of shit.
Geraldo thinks that the women would have shot the kid sooner if they were stalking a kid and then threatening him with a gun making him scream and then killing him. Geraldo is a piece of shit.
Notice that the part where whites gain a point in removing slavery and lose a point for not keeping slavery is referring to Rand Paul's recent explanation of GOP history.
"Black people need to take personal responsibility for white peoples fear of them" Colbert {Sarcasm} ... In other words... are the following images show... STOP BEING HYPOCRITES GOP FOLLOWERS!
"Black people need to take personal responsibility for white peoples fear of them" Colbert {Sarcasm} ... In other words... are the following images show... STOP BEING HYPOCRITES GOP FOLLOWERS!
This Is MOST Likely What Happened: He attacked Treyvon who happened to be a football player who punched him. Then he pulled out his gun and while Treyvon was screaming he threatened then killed him (if that's Trayvon Martin's voice, which it is, obviously but if not there are video clips below proving the prosecution's story. Zimmerman's family can't be blamed for lying but Zimmerman can)
Zimmerman was the one doing the threatening and the Stand Your Ground law will not apply for him, since he knew about it and used it while threatening Trayvon before killing him out of rage and/or hate. Then Zimmerman hit his head on the side of the sidewalk, badly. This story FITS the facts.
After Treyvon got shot he stopped screaming. Like in the Matrix. When Trinity got shot she stopped shooting. Same principle, i.e. getting shot shocks the body and so it stops doing whatever it was doing. If the prosecution had used the following clip they might even have won the case as most people seem to see life as a movie. Here are some clips so you can see what happens when Trinity gets shot (i.e. the same thing that happens in real life, you stop doing whatever you were doing - i.e. Trayvon was screaming TILL he got shot.) The prosecution was right. They just didn't prove their case properly.
Matrix-Trinity: Sample 1
Matrix-Trinity: Sample 2
Matrix-Trinity: Sample 3
GOP & Fox News Hypocrisy Over Trayvon Martin Illustrated Using A Latino Playing A Latino & A Brit Playing French Guy
Deports Authority: Al Madrigal disputes the notion that Latinos can't assimilate in America, since they already have the most important part down -- hating other Latinos. (06:22):
Deports Authority: Al Madrigal disputes the notion that Latinos can't assimilate in America, since they already have the most important part down -- hating other Latinos. (06:22):
Trayvon Martin - Stephen follows the Trayvon Martin case from shooting to acquittal, and doesn't understand why black and white Americans can't get along. (04:18):
No comments:
Post a Comment