1. BREAKING: Nazism Has Been Repackaged As "Conservatism" Part 1 - GOP And Fox News Lie The Way Hitler Explained
2. Nazism Has Been Repackaged as "Conservatism" Part 2 - Eugenics (The Control Of Population To Weed Out Undesirables)
3. Nazism Has Been Repackaged as "Conservatism" Part 3 - The Pattern Of Unquestioned Obedience To Ones Leader Is The Same For The GOP & Trump's Followers As It Was For The Nazis & Hitler!
This post outlines some more examples of Nazi-like Eugenics being carried out by the right wing in the name of "conservatism" with comparisons and further research articles to prove that the right are indeed pushing a very Nazi-like form of eugenics in America.
Reminder: Nazi Eugenics
Hitler, other Nazis and some German academics were also avid believers in eugenic pseudo-science. They thought of German society as a sick organism, its bloodstream contaminated by degenerate and undesirable elements. Those ‘contaminating’ Germany were the racially impure, the physically disabled, the mentally infirm, the criminally minded and the sexually aberrant.The Nazis believed the state should intervene to improve the health of its society – first to identify its contaminating elements, then to restrict their growth, then to eliminate them. This required difficult and unpalatable policies – but the Nazis justified it with eugenics theories and references to social Darwinism (the ‘survival of the fittest’).
Groups our homegrown Nazi movement (dubbed "conservatism") are discriminating against;
Flashback to Nazi Germany...
PERSECUTION OF ROMA (GYPSIES) IN PREWAR GERMANY, 1933–1939
Flash forward to Present Day Nazi Right Wing...
Conservative media outlets stoke fears that “gypsies” are coming to America and defecating in the streets
Right-wing media outlets are using a local story about a community of 40 Roma seeking asylum in California, Pennsylvania to fearmonger about immigration by hyping claims the Roma are beheading chickens and defecating in public.
Pittsburgh Post-Gazette reports on community of 40 Roma seeking asylum in Pennsylvania
Pittsburgh Post-Gazette: “Romanians seeking asylum are in California, Pa. as part of U.S. Immigration program.” On July 14, the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette reported on a community of 40 Roma immigrants in California, Pennsylvania, who “said they came to America to escape persecution in their Bucharest-area homes,” and “have been processed through U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement and have been released as part of the government’s Alternative to Detention program.” The local city council in the small city said they had no warning that the immigrants would be coming to their town, but noted that “there have been no instances of violence or aggression, and the immigrants involved in minor infractions have been duly cited and paid their fines”:
Most of the 40 or so Romanians who have moved to this community in the past two months do not speak English well, if at all. They do not know American customs and are unfamiliar with codes of conduct.And they had no idea that their sudden arrival would upset so many of the residents of this small town 35 miles south of Pittsburgh.More than 150 residents packed California borough council's municipal meeting room Thursday evening to voice concerns about the influx of the Romanian refugees.The Romanians, who said they came to America to escape persecution in their Bucharest-area homes, have been processed through U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement and have been released as part of the government’s Alternative to Detention program, which monitors flight from other nations. They are members of the group known as Roma, or gypsies, and are distinct from ethnic Romanians. Roma are minorities in many European states and often face prejudice and discrimination.'The federal program allows the immigrants find temporary homes, a cheaper and more humane alternative to keeping them in detention.[...]Angry residents at Thursday’s meeting said the newcomers throw trash around, park their cars in yards, disobey traffic rules, and are disruptive in markets. Others said that they’ve seen Romanians killing chickens and children defecating in public.[...]Council members, the borough administrator and police Chief Richard Encapera said they had no warning that the immigrants were coming and have had difficulty contacting federal authorities for assistance and explanations.But they also said there have been no instances of violence or aggression, and the immigrants involved in minor infractions have been duly cited and paid their fines. [Pittsburgh Post-Gazette, 7/18/17]
Right-wing media uses Pittsburgh Post-Gazette report to push stories about “gypsy” public defecation, littering, beheading chickens
FoxNews.com: “Immigrants defecate in streets, behead chickens, angry Pennsylvania residents say.” A FoxNews.com article headlined, “Immigrants defecate in streets, behead chickens, angry Pennsylvania residents say,” highlighted problems the immigrants had assimilating in the local area. And while the article did highlight some positive interactions between the Roma and California, Pennsylvania residents, the report mainly focused on claims that “some residents of a Pennsylvania town are upset by Romanian immigrants who they have accused of defecating in public and beheading chickens”:
Some residents of a Pennsylvania town are upset by Romanian immigrants who they have accused of defecating in public and beheading chickens.Residents in California, Pennsylvania – about 35 miles south of Pittsburgh – are angered by the alleged actions of the Romanian immigrants, the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette reported.Residents have accused the immigrants of throwing around trash, disobeying traffic laws, defecating in public, being disruptive in markets and killing chickens, according to the Post-Gazette.“What I’ve seen is men and children – never usually the women – the men and the children dropping their pants in the middle of the street, defecating, pulling their pants up and going on their way,” Dawne Roberts told WTAE-TV. [FoxNews.com, 7/14/17]
Breitbart: “Pennsylvania residents protest Romanian immigrants ‘defecating and killing chickens’ in public.” A July 14 Breitbart report cited the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette’s report and focused on claims by residents that “a group of reportedly undocumented Romanian immigrants … are defecating on the streets and publicly beheading chickens”:
A group of reportedly undocumented Romanian immigrants have caused controversy for residents in a Pennsylvania town, who say their new neighbors are defecating on the streets and publicly beheading chickens.“What I’ve seen is men and children — never usually the women — the men and the children dropping their pants in the middle of the street, defecating, pulling their pants up and going on their way,” resident Dawne Roberts told Pittsburgh’s Action 4 News.Another resident reported littering and rampant speeding. Now, more than 600 California, Pa, residents have signed a petition demanding that the Romanian immigrants cease their destructive behavior.Town official and borough administrator Dr. Richard Martin said the immigrants were relocated to his town, without warning, by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) as part of a program called Alternative to Detention. [Breitbart, 7/14/17]
The Blaze: “Community outraged after feds move in Romanian ‘gypsies’ -- defecating in streets, trash in yards.” On July 16, The Blaze cited the Post-Gazette’s report, and focused on complaints citing “trash in yards, disruptions in town markets, children and men defecating in public streets, and immigrants cutting off the heads of chickens in public areas”:
Residents in California, Pennsylvania, a small borough of the Pittsburgh metropolitan area, have said they are outraged after the federal government moved 40 Romanian “gypsies” into the town of 7,000 as part of the government’s Alternative to Detention program.On Thursday, more than 150 residents attended a community meeting about the immigrants, who residents say have failed to assimilate to American customs and norms. The residents cited trash in yards, disruptions in town markets, children and men defecating in public streets, and immigrants cutting off the heads of chickens in public areas, according to a report by WTAE-TV. None of the immigrants, who are undocumented, have been charged with any other serious criminal offenses.“We’re a very diverse town, we’re very open, but they aren’t assimilating to our laws,” said Pam Duricic, a resident of California, the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette reported. “We are understanding that these are immigrants. But this is not the same scenario as our grandparents. They didn’t come here to raise havoc.” [The Blaze, 7/16/17]
Gateway Pundit: “Residents of Small Pennsylvania Town Outraged By Immigrants Defecating in Streets, Beheading Chickens.” A July 17th post for The Gateway Pundit highlighted the Post-Gazette’s report, writing “Romanian gypsies in the United States have been in the news lately, as a Utah couple belonging to the community allegedly murdered their 3-year-old daughter”:
When a country is gracious enough to welcome you, conventional wisdom would say you treat its citizens and property with respect. Perhaps that’s demanding too much from a group of Romanian gypsies relocated to a small Pennsylvania town by the U.S. government. The Romanian gypsies are reportedly defecating in the streets and beheading chickens, leaving residents fuming.[...]Romanian gypsies in the United States have been in the news lately, as a Utah couple belonging to the community allegedly murdered their 3-year-old daughter. [Gateway Pundit, 7/17/17]
Tucker Carlson: “There are a lot of news stories … where groups of Roma settle in a new community and then defecate on playgrounds or sidewalks or on their front steps.” In a July 17 segment on Fox News’ Tucker Carlson Tonight, host Tucker Carlson hyped reports that “integration is not going well” for Roma asylum-seekers in Pennsylvania, claiming the community has “little regard either for the law or public decency.” After claiming “there are a lot of news stories about this from around the world -- where groups of Roma settle in a new community and then defecate on playgrounds or sidewalks or on their front steps,” Tucker argued, “This seems to me like a hostile act”:
TUCKER CARLSON (HOST): Well, in the last two months, several dozen Roma, more commonly known as "Gypsies" have been settled in California, Pennsylvania by the federal government. The Roma are seeking asylum saying they suffered racism in their native Romania. Integration is not going well. According to residents, they have little regard either for the law or public decency. Citizens say they defecate in public, chop the heads off chickens, leave trash everywhere and more.[...]I've spent time around the Roma and I've never heard anybody say they were violent, so that seems right to me. But I have heard a lot of people mention, and I'm just -- I hate to say it, but public defecation, there are a lot of news stories about this from around the world -- I'm serious, going back a long time in the U.K. and here where groups of Roma settle in a new community and then defecate on playgrounds, or sidewalks, or on their front steps. That seems to me a hostile act. Basically what you're saying --these are countries that have indoor plumbing, like, there are options. When you do that, you are saying "We reject you, and your mores."[...]GEORGE ELI: I've never witnessed any of my family do such a thing, and the way you're making it sound, with all due respect, or the way the papers are making it sound, is like they are doing it in protest, if, in fact, it's happening. I know things -- I'm here to talk about --CARLSON: Well, lots of people over a number of different years -- I mean, there are photographs of it actually online. [Fox News, Tucker Carlson Tonight, 7/17/17]
Alex Jones: “They're crapping in the streets,” and “at least Tucker Carlson said ‘Gypsies coming to America.’” On the July 18 edition of his radio show, Alex Jones read from a FoxNews.com article and complained that, “Not even Fox News will tell you in the article [The Roma community are] gypsies,” and added “at least Tucker Carlson said ‘gypsies coming to America,’” referring to Carlson’s Fox News report.
Flashback to Nazi Germany...
How the Nazis Destroyed the First Gay Rights Movement The history of LGBTQ rights is not a record of constant progress.
The first LGBTQ liberation movement
In the 1920s, Berlin had nearly 100 gay and lesbian bars or cafes. Vienna hadabout a dozen gay cafes, clubs and bookstores. In Paris, certain quarters were renowned for open displays of gay and trans nightlife. Even Florence, Italy, had its own gay district, as did many smaller European cities.
Films began depicting sympathetic gay characters. Protests were organized against offensive depictions of LGBTQ people in print or on stage. And media entrepreneurs realized there was a middle-class gay and trans readership to whom they could cater.
Partly driving this new era of tolerance were the doctors and scientists who started looking at homosexuality and “transvestism” (a word of that era that encompassed transgender people) as a natural characteristic with which some were born, and not a “derangement.” The story of Lili Elbe and the first modern sex change, made famous in the recent film “The Danish Girl,” reflected these trends.
For example, Berlin opened its Institute for Sexual Research in 1919, the place where the word “transsexual” was coined, and where people could receive counseling and other services. Its lead doctor, Magnus Hirschfeld, also consulted on the Lili Elbe sex change.
Connected to this institute was an organization called the “Scientific-Humanitarian Committee.” With the motto “justice through science,” this group of scientists and LGBTQ people promoted equal rights, arguing that LGBTQ people were not aberrations of nature.
Most European capitals hosted a branch of the group, which sponsored talks and sought the repeal of Germany’s “Paragraph 175.” Combining with other liberal groups and politicians, it succeeded in influencing a German parliamentary committee to recommend the repeal to the wider government in 1929.
The backlash
While these developments didn’t mean the end of centuries of intolerance, the 1920s and early ‘30s certainly looked like the beginning of the end. On the other hand, the greater “out-ness” of gay and trans people provoked their opponents.
A French reporter, bemoaning the sight of uncloseted LGBTQ people in public, complained, “the contagion … is corrupting every milieu.” The Berlin police grumbled that magazines aimed at gay men – which they called “obscene press materials” – were proliferating. In Vienna, lectures of the “Scientific Humanitarian Committee” might be packed with supporters, but one was attacked by young men hurling stink bombs. A Parisian town councilor in 1933 called it “a moral crisis” that gay people, known as “inverts” at that time, could be seen in public.
“Far be it from me to want to turn to fascism,” the councilor said, “but all the same, we have to agree that in some things those regimes have sometimes done good… One day Hitler and Mussolini woke up and said, ‘Honestly, the scandal has gone on long enough’ … And … the inverts … were chased out of Germany and Italy the very next day.”
The ascent of Fascism
It’s this willingness to make a blood sacrifice of minorities in exchange for “normalcy” or prosperity that has observers drawing uncomfortable comparisons between then and now.
In the 1930s, the Depression spread economic anxiety, while political fights in European parliaments tended to spill outside into actual street fights between Left and Right. Fascist parties offered Europeans a choice of stability at the price of democracy. Tolerance of minorities was destabilizing, they said. Expanding liberties gave “undesirable” people the liberty to undermine security and threaten traditional “moral” culture. Gay and trans people were an obvious target.
What happened next shows the whiplash speed with which the progress of a generation can be thrown into reverse.
The nightmare
One day in May 1933, pristine white-shirted students marched in front of Berlin’s Institute for Sexual Research – that safe haven for LGBTQ people – calling it “Un-German.” Later, a mob hauled out its library to be burned. Later still, its acting head was arrested.
When Nazi leader Adolph Hitler needed to justify arresting and murdering former political allies in 1934, he said they were gay. This fanned anti-gay zealotry by the Gestapo, which opened a special anti-gay branch. During the following year alone, the Gestapo arrested more than 8,500 gay men, quite possibly using a list of names and addresses seized at the Institute for Sexual Research. Not only was Paragraph 175 not erased, as a parliamentary committee had recommended just a few years before, it was amended to be more expansive and punitive.
As the Gestapo spread throughout Europe, it expanded the hunt. In Vienna, it hauled in every gay man on police lists and questioned them, trying to get them to name others. The fortunate ones went to jail. The less fortunate went to Buchenwald and Dachau. In conquered France, Alsace police worked with the Gestapo to arrest at least 200 men and send them to concentration camps. Italy, with a fascist regime obsessed with virility, sent at least 300 gay men to brutal camps during the war period, declaring them “dangerous for the integrity of the race.”
The total number of Europeans arrested for being LGBTQ under fascism is impossible to know because of the lack of reliable records. But a conservative estimate is that there were many tens of thousands to one hundred thousandarrests during the war period alone.
Under these nightmare conditions, far more LGBTQ people in Europe painstakingly hid their genuine sexuality to avoid suspicion, marrying members of the opposite sex, for example. Still, if they had been prominent members of the gay and trans community before the fascists came to power, as Berlin lesbian club owner Lotte Hahm was, it was too late to hide. She was sent to a concentration camp.
In those camps, gay men were marked with a pink triangle. In these places of horror, men with pink triangles were singled out for particular abuse. They were mechanically raped, castrated, favored for medical experiments and murderedfor guards’ sadistic pleasure even when they were not sentenced for “liquidation.” One gay man attributed his survival to swapping his pink triangle for a red one – indicating he was merely a Communist. They were ostracized and tormented by their fellow inmates, too.
Flash forward to Present Day Nazi Right Wing...
Alternet: Trump Cites 'Tremendous Costs' for Transgender Servicemembers, When Military Spends Five Times More on Erectile Dysfunction Pills Trump announced a ban on transgender people serving in the U.S. military Wednesday morning.
Civil rights expert: Trump's latest attack on transgender Americans is "part of a pattern"Maya Harris: “In the broader context, this is part of a pattern of actually removing protections and undermining the rights of LGBT people”
EXCLUSIVE - TRANSGENDER VETERANS REACT TO TRUMP'S TRANS MILITARY BA 7/26/2017 Transgender veterans join Trevor to discuss President Trump's ban on trans people in the military and unpack the real-life impact the decision will have on service members.
Trump's trans military ban eschews years of research in favor of junk science from a hate group
Other notable attacks on people disagreeing with their Nazi-like behavior and belief structures...
Pro-Trump internet personalities throw tantrums after ADL identifies their hateful rhetoric
An ingenious way of attacking a group these Nazis have been attacking for a while;
Laura Ingraham asks why "the Muslims" are "never supporting the conservatives on" anti-LGBTQ initiatives Ingraham: "We always hear about the Muslim soldiers. Where the heck are the Muslim soldiers? They just never say anything"
Hate groups hide years of extremism behind baseless "fake news" accusations
After immigrants die in Texas, right-wing media push for policies that would exacerbate the problem Experts agree that hardline immigration policies correlate with an increase in immigrant deaths
How nativist groups are taking down DACA Conservative and mainstream media have facilitated nativist groups’ influence in the immigration debate
Before Trump banned transgender people from serving in military, here's who praised him as pro-LGBTQ
On CNN, Christine Quinn calls Trump’s transgender military ban "un-American, and a goddamned disgrace" Quinn: "One of the last things transgender service members might have heard from their commander in chief is that they are unworthy"
Watch a transgender former Navy SEAL explain the disruption Trump's military ban on trans service members will have on the military
White nationalist website joins other hate groups in smear campaign against SPLC
Alex Jones and Mike Cernovich call the Anti-Defamation League an anti-American Jewish mafia Alex Jones: ADL has "always been the group that feeds on the Jews working with the Nazis"
Tucker Carlson fails to ask Pence about his opposition to transgender military service
Note: The following example of eugenics against members of the American society is more akin to slavery than Eugenics but it does contain that basic Nazi sentiment of weeding out people they see as undesirable through means such as death (in this example, working to death but it could also be denying people food or healthcare so they die easier);Flash forward to Present Day Nazi Right Wing...
Alternet: Trump Cites 'Tremendous Costs' for Transgender Servicemembers, When Military Spends Five Times More on Erectile Dysfunction Pills Trump announced a ban on transgender people serving in the U.S. military Wednesday morning.
Civil rights expert: Trump's latest attack on transgender Americans is "part of a pattern"Maya Harris: “In the broader context, this is part of a pattern of actually removing protections and undermining the rights of LGBT people”
STEPHANIE RHULE (HOST): You’re a civil rights attorney, what's your take on this?SEEMA IYER: It's shocking because, your question was why now, right? The policy has been that if you're openly transgender and you're able to serve, you can serve. So when you say why now, I am suspecting that perhaps there was some impetus, that something happened on the battlefield or something happened during training to cause other members of the military or civilians some type of harm, and then there would be a reason to change the policy. But without a reason to change the policy, there's no reason to change it except for the fact that he's looking for a distraction from Russiagate, right?MAYA HARRIS: But, I mean, you have to also put this in the broader context as well, which is this is part of a pattern. At the beginning of the administration, the administration also stepped back on the protection of transgender students, and so I think that you really do have to also put it in the broader context. I'm sure there's no doubt that the timing of this could potentially be because there's a reason or because it helps to show the base that don't worry, I'm still working on your agenda even though I'm berating your beloved attorney general, you know, in public. But in the broader context, this is part of a pattern of actually removing protections and undermining the rights of LGBT people.
Related:
Previously:
Before Trump banned transgender people from serving in military, here's who praised him as pro-LGBTQ
EXCLUSIVE - TRANSGENDER VETERANS REACT TO TRUMP'S TRANS MILITARY BA 7/26/2017 Transgender veterans join Trevor to discuss President Trump's ban on trans people in the military and unpack the real-life impact the decision will have on service members.
Trump announced decision to reimplement a ban on transgender military service in a series of tweets
Trump tweeted his decision to reimplement a ban on transgender people from serving in U.S. military, citing “tremendous medical costs” and “disruption.” In a series of tweets published on July 26, President Donald Trump said that the United States will no longer “accept or allow” transgender people to serve in the military. Trump continued, “Our military must be focused on decisive and overwhelming victory and cannot be burdened with the tremendous medical costs and disruption that transgender in the military would entail.” [Twitter, 7/26/17, 7/26/17, 7/26/17]
AP: Pentagon officials were caught off guard by Trump’s early morning tweets, which “did not say what would happen to transgender people already in the military.” According to The Associated Press, transgender people have openly served in the armed forces since June 2016, when then-Defense Secretary Ash Carter lifted a prior ban. The Associated Press reported that Pentagon staff, including those serving under current Defense Secretary Jim Mattis “appeared to have been caught off guard by Trump’s tweets.” The article stated that defense officials estimated that there are up to 250 service members in the process of transitioning within the Pentagon system, adding that the fate of those who are already on active duty is unclear at this point. [The Associated Press, 7/26/17]
Anti-LGBTQ hate group Family Research Council estimated in a recent report, amplified in right-wing media, that trans-inclusive military service would cost $1.9 billion to $3.7 billion over a decade
Family Research Council: Over the next 10 years, allowing transgender people to serve in the military could cost “as much as $1.9 to $3.7 billion.” Anti-LGBTQ hate group Family Research Council (FRC) published a report in July by senior policy fellow Peter Sprigg that claimed the cost of allowing transgender people to serve in the military would actually be up to 8 times higher than previous estimates. Included in this total was both “direct medical costs and the cost of potential lost time of deployable service.” Just a few days before the report’s release, FRC began to run political ads that claimed health care costs for transgender service members would compromise military spending and that featured personal photos of transgender former soldier Chelsea Manning. [Family Research Council, accessed 7/26/17, 7/24/17; HuffPost, 7/20/17]
Right-wing media outlets amplified FRC’s exaggerated projections on the cost of allowing transgender people to openly serve in the military. Right-wing media outlets including Barbwire, CBN News, and Newsmax provided a platform for FRC representatives to spread misinformation under the guise of “research” and to help bolster the organization’s claims. [Barbwire, 7/23/17; CBN News, 7/24/17; Newsmax 7/25/17]
Numerous studies found that removing the ban on trans military service would not impact readiness, incur minimal costs, and Defense Department said a decision that was made carefully
Leading researchers on trans military service: “There is no compelling medical reason for the ban on service,” and health care for trans service members “should be managed using the same standards that apply to all others.” After conducting a review of 18 countries that allow transgender troops to serve openly, along with a review of Department of Defense policies, leading researchers and experts published a 2014 report on transgender military service in a peer-reviewed academic journal concluding that there is “no compelling medical reason” for a ban on transgender people serving in the military. They also found that any associated medical care costs should be “managed using the same standards that apply to all others,” saying removing the ban “would improve health outcomes, enable commanders to better care for their troops, and reflect the military’s commitment to providing outstanding medical care for all military personnel.” An article published the following year estimated that a repeal of the ban would cost the military approximately $5.6 million annually to provide transition-related health care for active personnel. [Medical Aspects of Transgender Military Service, Sage Journals, 8/19/14; Palm Center, 3/14/14; New England Journal of Medicine, 9/17/15]
Rand Corporation: Allowing transgender people to openly serve in the military would have “minimal likely impact” on military readiness and would result in “relatively low” additional health care costs. The Pentagon commissioned the Rand Corporation to conduct a 2016 review and economic analysis of the potential impact of allowing transgender people to openly serve in the military. The study estimated that increases to annual health care costs would fall between $2.4 and $8.4 million annually, accounting for only a “0.04- to 0.13-percent increase in active-component health care expenditures,” noting that the impact on the budget was “relatively low.” Further, based on evidence from foreign militaries, the report concluded that inclusive military service would have “little or no impact on unit cohesion, operational effectiveness, or readiness. Commanders noted that the policies had benefits for all service members by creating a more inclusive and diverse force.” [Rand Corporation, accessed 7/26/17]
Other notable attacks on people disagreeing with their Nazi-like behavior and belief structures...
Pro-Trump internet personalities throw tantrums after ADL identifies their hateful rhetoric
Pro-Trump internet trolls claimed that the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) was a "terrorist organization" and compared the group to Nazis after ADL identified some of the biggest online personalities of the “alt-right” and “alt-lite” movements and called them out for spreading hateful rhetoric.
The ADL recently published a list of “alt-right” and “alt-lite” figures, identifying key players in both the white supremacist “alt-right” and the fringe right-wing media landscape of media trolls and smear merchants it inspired, which the ADL called the “alt-lite.” It included internet troll and Infowars contributor Mike Cernovich; smear merchant Jack Posobiec, who once received a temporary White House press pass; disgraced Breitbart provocateur Milo Yiannopoulos; The Gateway Pundit’s Lucian Wintrich; and Rebel Media’s Gavin McInnes, using the “alt-lite” banner to describe their prior affiliation and promotion of “alt-right” figures and ideologies. In a Periscope live stream, Cernovich responded to the list’s publication by urging his followers to spread the hashtag “#ADLTerror” on Twitter. Cernovich also called ADL “a terrorist organization” that had “targeted” him and his family for “murder and assassination” by including his name in the list.
Soon after Cernovich launched the hashtag, other alternative media personalities who were also mentioned in the ADL’s list rallied to attack the organization. Posobiec compared ADL’s members to Nazis and claimed the “death list” was being used to target Trump supporters; Wintrich called the ADL a “liberal terrorist organization” whose “only qualifier” to label people a hate group leader was support for Trump; Yiannopoulos accused the ADL of trying to get pro-Trump media figures like himself “hurt or killed by painting targets on our backs”; McInnes threatened to “sue the living shit out of everyone even remotely involved” with the list if he was attacked following its publication.
An ingenious way of attacking a group these Nazis have been attacking for a while;
Laura Ingraham asks why "the Muslims" are "never supporting the conservatives on" anti-LGBTQ initiatives Ingraham: "We always hear about the Muslim soldiers. Where the heck are the Muslim soldiers? They just never say anything"
LAURA INGRAHAM (HOST): Join the military to get the [gender reassignment] operation for free? Probably get some one of these groups to sponsor you and get it for free. I mean -- I mean, maybe. I guess people do a lot of things to get stuff for free. I just don't believe it's 6,630 people. I mean, ten years ago, wasn't it on the -- in the diagnostic manual as a mental disorder? Ten years ago? Ten -- check the -- check the year. I think it was ten years ago it was a mental disorder. Now it's streamlined all through, it's just everything's the same, nothing's, nothing's -- your relation no better than this one. OK, I guess, so just everything's the same. I mean how is that all working out for us? No difference, everything's the same.And, by the way, your religious beliefs don't count for anything. Like, if you're a chaplain or if you're a -- oh sorry, imam in the military. Where are the Muslims? I always say where are the Muslims on these issues? Why are they never supporting the conservatives on this? I don't want to say "conservative," "traditionalists." Do you notice that? The Muslim -- we always hear about the Muslim soldiers. Where the heck are the Muslim soldiers? They just never say anything.Line four, Mike, go ahead. Where are the Muslims? Why don't they ever speak out on these issues? Never. Cat got their tongue?
Previously:
Hate groups hide years of extremism behind baseless "fake news" accusations
A news site run by anti-LGBTQ hate group American Family Association defended the Alliance Defending Freedom, also a hate group, from being labeled by ABC News and called the outlet “fake news.”
One News Now (ONN) ran a July 17 article titled “'Fake news' fraternity welcomes a new member” that reported on Alliance Defending Freedom’s (ADF) response to an ABC report that labels the organization as a hate group. The outlet -- like NBC -- was using the Southern Poverty Law Center’s (SPLC) “hate group” designation in its coverage of the controversy surrounding Attorney General Jeff Sessions’ recent speech at an ADF event. Both reports drew a right-wing media outcry. SPLC designated ADF a hate group in February for “regularly demoniz[ing] LGBT people” and supporting “the criminalization of homosexuality in several countries.”
In her interview with ONN about SPLC’s designation and recent news reports using the “hate group” designation, ADF director of communications Kerri Kupec described SPLC’s claim that ADF supports “recriminalization of homosexuality abroad” as “fake news.” She said: “I have no idea where that came from.” Despite trying to hide behind accusations of “fake news,” ADF has a longstanding history of supporting the criminalization of LGBTQ people and a body of work that is well-documented in the media. That work has included filing amicus briefs in the landmark 2003 Supreme Court case Lawrence v. Texas, one of which argued that “sodomy is criminally punishable conduct and not a constitutionally protected activity.” ADF’s international efforts are far-reaching and include previously supporting anti-sodomy laws in Jamaica and India, as well as offering legal assistance to a group working to keep criminalization laws on the books in Belize.
ONN is an affiliate of American Family News Networks (AFN), a media conglomerate run by the hate group American Family Association (AFA). AFA operates a large network of media outlets, action arms, and engagement campaigns aimed at individuals who “are alarmed by the increasing ungodliness and depravity assaulting our nation, tired of cursing the darkness, and ready to light a bonfire.” AFN describes itself as a “Christian news service - with more than 1,200 broadcast, print, and online affiliates in 45 states and 11 foreign countries - that exists to present the day's stories from a biblical perspective.” The SPLC designated AFA a hate group in 2010 for spreading “demonizing propaganda” and “known falsehoods” about LGBTQ people.
How nativist groups are taking down DACA Conservative and mainstream media have facilitated nativist groups’ influence in the immigration debate
Before Trump banned transgender people from serving in military, here's who praised him as pro-LGBTQ
On CNN, Christine Quinn calls Trump’s transgender military ban "un-American, and a goddamned disgrace" Quinn: "One of the last things transgender service members might have heard from their commander in chief is that they are unworthy"
Watch a transgender former Navy SEAL explain the disruption Trump's military ban on trans service members will have on the military
White nationalist website joins other hate groups in smear campaign against SPLC
VDARE.com, which the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) has described as a “white nationalist” and “anti-immigration hate website,” has joined other hate groups in an official smear campaign against SPLC launched by anti-LGBTQ Family Research Council (FRC).
FRC and other organizations that SPLC has labeled hate groups launched a campaign on July 17 accusing SPLC of “fueling hate, killing free speech and even encouraging terrorist-style attacks on those it doesn’t agree with,” as the Washington Examiner described it. The campaign included a “planned Monday tweetstorm” and the suggestion that its supporters use the hashtag “#SPLCexposed.”
FRC and other hate groups have repeatedly pushed the myth that SPLC labels as “hate groups” those organizations that it “simply disagree[s] with.” In fact, SPLC has more extensive criteria for the distinction. It designates anti-LGBTQ hate groups as such when they knowingly spread “demonizing lies about the LGBT community,” engage in “baseless, incendiary name-calling,” or actively work to criminalize LGBTQ people. Regarding anti-immigrant groups, SPLC wrote that though “many groups criticize high levels of immigration and some … typically confront or harass individual immigrants and their supporters, anti-immigrant hate groups generally go further by pushing racist propaganda.” It continued that most anti-immigrant hate groups “subscribe to one of two conspiracy theories that have no basis in fact,” including that Mexico is trying to “‘reconquer’ the American Southwest” and that “Mexico, Canada and the United States are secretly planning to merge into a European Union-like entity.” SPLC also clearly defines its anti-Muslim hate group label, noting that these groups “hold conspiratorial views regarding the inherent danger to America by its Muslim-American community” and view Muslims as “intent on undermining and eventually replacing American democracy and Western civilization with Islamic despotism.”
While acknowledging that his site hosts "white nationalists" like Taylor, Brimelow argues that they are merely people who "aim to defend the interests of American whites. They are not white supremacists. They do not advocate violence. They are rational and civil. They brush their teeth. But they unashamedly work for their people." Brimelow goes on to say that as dark-skinned immigration from the Third World continues, "this type of interest-group ‘white nationalism’ will inexorably increase." What Brimelow doesn’t mention is that VDARE.com also posts stories by one of the most important anti-Semites in America, Kevin MacDonald, a professor of psychology at the California State University, Long Beach. MacDonald believes Jews are genetically driven to undermine the power of whites by pushing such things as Third World immigration.
In addition to VDARE, FRC’s campaign was joined by a horde of other SPLC-identified hate groups or their representatives, such as the anti-Muslim ACT for America, the executive director of the anti-immigrant Center for Immigration Studies (CIS), and anti-immigrant groups ProEnglish and Federation for American Immigration Reform (FAIR).
Alex Jones and Mike Cernovich call the Anti-Defamation League an anti-American Jewish mafia Alex Jones: ADL has "always been the group that feeds on the Jews working with the Nazis"
ALEX JONES (HOST): They like literally put you next to neo-Nazis and clearly they’re trying to get somebody just like Southern Poverty Law Center has gotten a bunch of people shot when they attacked the Family Research Council. I mean they really are crazy.[…]Bottom line, the leftist Jews have completely made an alliance with radical Islam and just like Soros helped round up Jews for Hitler, he’s doing it again today. I mean Soros is literally the number one living Nazi.MIKE CERNOVICH: Right and conservative Jews are saying that is why I have always been an outspoken critic of anti-Semitism. What I’ve been telling people is I go, if you think that Jews just all think alike you don’t really understand anything at all.JONES: You’re playing into the globalist master manipulation.CERNOVICH: Yeah exactly. The globalists make it want to seem like all Jews are anti-America, and that actually isn’t true. The ADL is anti-America, the ADL is anti-freedom, but –JONES: Because they go back to the Jewish mafia in 1913 founded it. It was the Jewish mafia feeding off Jews, abusing Jews, and it was the Jewish mafia in Europe that wouldn’t let Jews get out and made them pay money to them. So it’s always been the group that feeds on the Jews working with the Nazis.CERNOVICH: Exactly and the ADL would extort Jews actually and what the ADL is doing now is extorting Jews. They’re saying, “Oh my god, look at all these people.” Most of the people they mentioned on the list I’d never even heard of. Some guy with 100 people read his blog, he gets two blog comments –JONES: And they put you in with the Nazi guy that you’ve made fun of. It’s just crazy.CERNOVICH: Yeah, and it’s extorting Jews, they want to scare Jews and made them terrified so that they can get more money and more donations. So it’s another form of terrorism by the ADL.
Previously:
Tucker Carlson fails to ask Pence about his opposition to transgender military service
The July 26 edition of Fox News’ Tucker Carlson Tonight featured a pre-taped interview with Vice President Mike Pence. Notably absent from the interview was any reference to Pence’s opposition to trans military service, service President Donald Trump has just banned.
Pence has been reportedly working behind the scenes to ensure the reversal of the Obama administration’s repeal of the transgender ban, but it failed to pass muster in Congress. Carlson skirted the issue, focusing on the GOP’s struggling health care bill during the interview rather than asking Pence about the new policy implementation and its potential impact. Outside of his interview with Pence, Carlson did mention the policy, erroneously stating that the ban was due to prohibitive costs and a negative impact on military readiness, ignoring years of research and policy analysis conducted prior to the Department of Defense’s decision to repeal the ban in 2016.
Jesse Watters: "The able-bodied" on food stamps should work for it by building the border wall
JESSE WATTERS (HOST): Maybe the able-bodied that are getting the food stamps could work for the food stamps by building the wall.
Previously:
Fox's Shameless Misrepresentation Of SNAP Recipients (Eugenics of the poor)
Moment of Zen On How The Republicans Basically Just Hate Everyone Who Disagrees With Them Like The Nazis
SCORN IN THE U.S.A. 10/18/2011 It must be tough for Republicans to love America so much but hate almost three-quarters of the people living in it.
Honorable Mention;
THE GOP FAILS TO REPEAL OBAMACARE (AGAIN) & TRUMP TARGETS TRANS SOLDIERS 7/26/2017 Senate Republicans once again push to repeal the Affordable Care Act, and President Trump takes to Twitter to ban transgender people from serving in the military.
Here you see John McCain flip flopping after grandstanding as a political tactic of attack...
... to vote for the Ultimate in Eugenics.... the extermination of the poor....
So far only Democracy now has stated facts of the healthcare bill. i.e. Its a real life GOP death panel bill condemning approximately 28,600 Americans to death;
Reminder: Nazi Eugenics
Hitler, other Nazis and some German academics were also avid believers in eugenic pseudo-science. They thought of German society as a sick organism, its bloodstream contaminated by degenerate and undesirable elements. Those ‘contaminating’ Germany were the racially impure, the physically disabled, the mentally infirm, the criminally minded and the sexually aberrant.The Nazis believed the state should intervene to improve the health of its society – first to identify its contaminating elements, then to restrict their growth, then to eliminate them. This required difficult and unpalatable policies – but the Nazis justified it with eugenics theories and references to social Darwinism (the ‘survival of the fittest’).
Other posts in this series;BREAKING: Nazism Has Been Repackaged as "Conservatism"
Related Links;
No comments:
Post a Comment