Feb 26, 2016

Hillary & Bill to Henry Kissinger to Bush-Cheney to the Beltway Media - An Unholy Alliance?

Background:

Bill Clinton Made The Mass Incarceration Situation Worse In The Country. Hillary Helped, Passionately. (Includes Info On Clinton & Democrat Connections To Private Prison Industry)

Beltway Media Covers Up Reporting On A Bi-Partisan Senate Report Proving We Were Misled Into The Iraq War By The Bush Administration & Jon Stewart Makes Fun Of The Media's Coverup

Jon Stewart Slams The Media for Continuing To Not Report Properly on The Iraq War... AGAIN!

Rachel Maddow Talks About The Bush Dynasty & How The Media Doesn't Talk About The Wars They Have Started

Psychotic Or Prophetic? 10 Hours Before 9/11 Bill Clinton Lamented Not Killing Innocents For A CHANCE At Killing Osama Bin Laden, Now He Brags About Being Liked By, Family Friend, War Criminal Henry Kissinger! 

Video: Hillary Clinton Iraq War Vote Speech (Passionate supporting it)




Keep in mind that Obama put his opponents/enemies in his Administration (& is currently nominating a REPUBLICAN for the Supreme Court... a sort of Stockholm Syndrome type behavior). Hillary was an opponent turned "close advisor". Hillary is connected to the Iraq Oil War and has never called Dick Cheney & Bush out for their WAR PROFITEERING and other things making it seem like she is complicit and said what she said (that her votes on Iraq was a mistake) to cover up her Iraq War vote after it became a political problem (the way she cut ties with the private prison industry when it became a problem).

I've outlined a bunch of proofs that paint a picture. A little summary;

1. Hillary is family friends with a war criminal & ex- Sect of State known for supporting genocide as policy. He also complimented her work at the State Dept. It's clear where she gets her foreign policy ideas from. (at least to me).

2. Hillary PASSIONATELY voted for the Iraq War. There are many problems with this war, to the point where many many many people have commented that Bush-Cheney should have been indicted for treason, or at least unconstitutional behavior such as torture. Hillary is strangely silent on this matter though Obama did pardon Cheney with no public investigation and Hillary was by his side when he did so.

3. The pattern used in the Iraq War (mass murder and Genocide) is the same type of policy Hillary seems to have applied in the State Department. Same policies Henry Kissinger believes is appropriate as foreign policy.

4. Henry Kissinger is also well known adviser to the Bush-Cheney team during the Iraq War.

Clearly, the link between Bush-Cheney and Hillary is Henry Kissinger. This link between them is so strong you can literally see the same patterns of killing people in how both people handled their State Departments.

5. Finally, there is a list of proofs of the media coveirng up the Iraq War from Rachel Maddow to Jon Stewart (before he left the daily show)

The link between Hillary, Bush-Cheney & The Media is there. And it's one of actions taken not a chance meeting.

Proofs

Hillary voted for the Iraq Oil War (still hasn't called Cheney out on his war profiteering) and ultimately destroyed hundreds of thousands of more lives with her brilliant decision making skills. 


Background:

CNN: Hillary Clinton: No regret on Iraq vote








Using her husband's tactic of making bad decisions with a passion and apologizing later when everyone knows they are wrong (these are the sorts of decision making skills some people wantto elect to office):

PoliticoHillary Clinton says her Iraq war vote was a 'mistake'







NEW YORK -- Henry Kissinger has been advising President Bush and Vice President Cheney about Iraq, telling them that "victory is the only meaningful exit strategy," author and journalist Bob Woodward said.


Makes me wonder if Hillary Clinton was the advisor behind the killing of innocent children in the middle east. It certainly fits with her profile, now;

From Salon: The face of collateral damage Photos of missile debris help trace the path of a CIA drone missile that killed a young girl

The civilian massacre the US neither confirms nor denies

Please support our work - share this article
drone yemen composite
Three unnamed victims of the December 17 2009 strike (Photos courtesy Al Jazeera)




Family of Mohammed Nasser Awad Jaljala
Name
Age
Status
Mohammed Nasser Awad Jaljala
60
Father
Nousa Mohammed Saleh El-Souwa
30
Wife
Nasser Mohammed Nasser
6
Son
Arwa Mohammed Nasser
4
Daughter
Fatima Mohammed Nasser
2
Daughter
Family of Ali Mohammed Nasser Jaljala:
Name
Age
Status
Ali Mohammed Nasser
35
Father
Qubla Al-Kharibi Salem
25
Wife
Afrah Ali Mohammed Nasser
9
Daughter
Zayda Ali Mohammed Nasser
7
Daughter
Hoda Ali Mohammed Nasser
5
Daughter
Sheikha Ali Mohammed Nasser
4
Daughter
Family of Ahmed Mohammed Nasser Jaljala:
Name
Age
Status
Ahmed Mohammed Nasser Jaljala
30
Father
Qubla Salem Nasser
21
Wife
Mouhsena Ahmed Adiyou
50
Mother

The dead from the Anbour clan:
Family of Abdullah Mokbel Salem Louqye
Name
Age
Status
Abdullah Mokbel Salem Louqye
37
Father
Saleha Ali Ahmed Mansour
30
Wife
Ibrahim Abdullah Mokbel Salem Louqye
13
Son
Asmaa Abdullah Mokbel Salem Louqye
9
Daughter
Salma Abdullah Mokbel Salem Louqye
4
Daughter
Fatima Abdullah Mokbel Salem Louqye
3
Daughter
Family of Ali Mokbel Salem Louqye
Name
Age
Status
Ali Mokbel Salem Louqye
36
Father
Hanaa Abdallah Monser
28
Wife
Moheile Mohammed Saeed Yaslem
30
Safaa Ali Mokbel Salem
25
Daughter
Khadije Ali Mokbel Louqye
1
Daughter
Hanaa Ali Mokbel Louqye
6
Daughter
Mohammed Ali Mokbel Salem Louqye
4
Son
Family of Mokbel Salem Louqye:
Name
Age
Status
Fatima Yaslem Al-Rawami
67
First Wife
Maryam Awad Nasser
43
Second Wife
Jawass Mokbel Salem Louqye
15
Daughter
Family of Abdullah Awad Sheikh:
Name
Age
Status
Abdullah Awad Sheikh
65
Father
Family of Hussein Abdullah Awad Sheikh:
Name
Age
Status
Hanane Mohammed Jadib
25
Wife
Maryam Hussein Abdullah Awad
2,9
Daughter
Shafiq Hussein Abdullah Awad
1,5
Daughter
Family of Nasser Mahdi Ahmad Bouh:
Name
Age
Status
Maryam Mokbel Salem Louqye
38
Wife
Sheikha Nasser Mahdi Ahmad Bouh
3
Daughter
Family of Mohammed Saleh Mohammed Ali Al-Anbouri:
Name
Age
Status
Amina Abdullah Awad Sheikh
27
Wife
Maha Mohammed Saleh Mohammed
12
Son
Soumaya Mohammed Saleh Mohammed
9
Son
Shafika Mohammed Saleh Mohammed
4
Son
Shafiq Mohammed Saleh Mohammed
2
Son





Proof Iraq Oil War was for oil

Rachel Maddow Documentary Special: "Why We Did It" - The Invasion of Iraq (FULL) 





Highlights showing Cheney's connections to the oil companies and the planning for take over of the oil fields of Iraq that took place in the Bush Administration... months before 9/11!!!!





Related articles:
Cheney's Halliburton Made $39.5 Billion on Iraq War
Dick Cheney - Neo Con War Profiteer


Proof of hundreds of thousands of lives being destroyed including 4000+ soldiers (US Citizens out there on a lie)




Miscellaneous;


Media Helped Cover up The Iraq Oil War (Hillary Said Nothing)



Media's Iraq War Cover-Up



Other blog posts;





Hillary Clinton Helped Promote Mass Incarceration & Voted For The Iraq Oil War - A Decision That Destroyed Hundreds of Thousands Of Lives



The Iraq War Was For Oil, Something Many People Talking On TV Don't Seem To Be Aware Of In Thier Analysis Making All Of their Analysis Faulty (Hillary still hasnt called Cheney & the GOP Est for thier oil war - see below)






The Hillary Clinton Chronicles


The Bill Clinton Chronicles



Bill Clinton Made The Mass Incarceration Situation Worse In The Country. Hillary Helped, Passionately. (Includes Info On Clinton & Democrat Connections To Private Prison Industry)


The Crime Bill Was Full Of Flaws. Yet Both Bill & Hillary Pushed It Passionately. Did They Get It Done? Yes. Was It Good? No.

First, this is old news and Bill apologized for it as it couldn't be avoided (unlike his artful dodge on the Glass Steagal Act - I'm not including lying under oath for Monica Lewinsky here as people don't care much about it and although they think Bill was lying about 'not inhaling' - or why would he say he didn't like it? - they tend to just see it as unimportant but it does reveal a pattern of behavior, i.e. one of a compulsive liar);

(CNN)Bill Clinton said Wednesday that the crime bill he signed into law as President in 1994 worsened the nation's criminal justice system by increasing prison sentences.
"I signed a bill that made the problem worse," Clinton told an audience at the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People's annual meeting in Philadelphia. "And I want to admit it."

Now look at the havoc the Clinton's have wrought on the Nation with this (I understand some people seeing the graph as going up, and thus representing a pattern, choose to absolve Clinton's of any guilt association to it. I happen to disagree. We have an Ex-President and his wife running AGAIN. We know EXACTLY what we are going to get... if we pull off the wool of denial from our eyes);


NPR: 20 Years Later, Parts Of Major Crime Bill Viewed As Terrible Mistake


Twenty years ago this week, in 1994, then-President Bill Clinton signed a crime bill. It was, in effect, a long-term experiment in various ways to fight crime.
The measure paid to put more cops on the beat, trained police and lawyers to investigate domestic violence, imposed tougher prison sentences and provided money for extra prisons.
Clinton described his motivation to pass the 1994 Violent Crime Control Act in stark terms.
"Gangs and drugs have taken over our streets and undermined our schools," he said. "Every day, we read about somebody else who has literally gotten away with murder."
And if Clinton and Congress reflected the punitive mindset of the American people, what they didn't know was that soaring murder rates and violent crime had already begun what would become a long downward turn, according to criminologists and policymakers.
Nicholas Turner is president of the Vera Institute, a nonprofit that researches crime policy. Turner took a minute this week to consider the tough-on-crime rhetoric of the 1990s.
"Criminal justice policy was very much driven by public sentiment and a political instinct to appeal to the more negative punitive elements of public sentiment rather than to be driven by the facts," he said.
And that public sentiment called for filling up the nation's prisons, a key part of the 1994 crime bill.
These days, Jeremy Travis is president of the John Jay College of Criminal Justice. But 20 years ago, he attended the signing ceremony for the crime bill — and joined the Clinton Justice Department.
"Here's the federal government coming in and saying we'll give you money if you punish people more severely, and 28 states and the District of Columbia followed the money and enacted stricter sentencing laws for violent offenses," Travis says.

She pushed a bad bill passionately to look good in an election. She did that recently with Bernie Sanders by talking about an AWFUL bill she passed to "help" poor immigrants. How anyone could pass such a horrendous bill is terrifying me more than anything else as this reveals a pattern of behavior and decision making that I PERSONALLY find unacceptable in a President. Some people clearly do not.


The Atlantic: Hillary Clinton and the Tragic Politics of Crime - The criminal-justice policies she now denounces once helped her husband capture the White House.


With the exception of gay rights, no public-policy debate has shifted more dramatically in my adult lifetime than the debate over crime. In 1992, when Bill Clinton flew back to Arkansas to oversee the execution of a mentally retarded African American murderer, the move helped him in New Hampshire’s Democratic primary. In 1994, Clinton’s crime bill—which among other things, expanded the death penalty, encouraged states to lengthen prison sentences and eliminated federal funding for inmate education—garnered the votes of every Democratic Senator except one.

Today, by contrast, Hillary Clinton is loudly repudiating the “tough on crime” policies that she and her husband once championed. Even more remarkably, prominent Republicans are nodding along.

To those who see Hillary’s new crime agenda as a flip-flop, her campaign has a rejoinder: Different policies make sense at different times. As Clinton spokesperson Jesse Ferguson tweeted, “HRC policy on internet might also be different than WJC policy in 1994. Not b/c he was wrong but b/c times change.”

The problem with this argument is that many of the crime policies the Clintons supported in the 1990s were probably wrong even back then. Yes, the crime bill did some good: It put more cops on the street and increased penalties for sex crimes. But it also helped spawn the very “era of mass incarceration” that Hillary now denounces. It’s not just that the bill allocated almost $10 billion in federal-prison construction money. It only allocated it to states that adopted “truth-in-sentencing” laws that dramatically increased the amount of time criminals served. As NYU Law School’s Brennan Center has noted, the number of states with such laws rose from five when the bill was signed to 29 by Clinton’s last year in office. Over the course of Clinton’s presidency, the number of Americans in prison rose almost 60 percent.


I found a post on Daily Kos attempting to debunk the private prison connection to Hillary CLinton and accidently proved that ALL of the Democrats take private prison money!;

Daily Kos: Corrections Corporation of America gave 78% of donations to Republicans and 22% to Democrats: https://www.opensecrets.org/...

Of course, with articles like 'Hillary cuts ties with Private Prison money' and confirmed donations to ALL democrats I don't take the title of the article I got the donation info from seriously.





On Friday morning, the campaign of Democratic presidential hopeful Hillary Clinton announced they will no longer accept donations from federally registered lobbyists or PACs for private prison companies.
“When we’re dealing with a mass incarceration crisis, we don’t need private industry incentives that may contribute — or have the appearance of contributing — to over-incarceration,” campaign spokesperson Xochitl Hinojosa told ThinkProgress, explaining that Clinton will donate the large amount she has already received from these sources to a yet-to-be-named charity.
Hinojosa explained that the move is part of Clinton’s promise to “end the era of mass incarceration,” especially private prisons and private immigrant detention centers.
“She believes that we should not contract out this core responsibility of the federal government,” Hinojosa said. “This is only one of many ways that she believes we need to re-balance our criminal justice and immigration systems.”
Yet the decision came after months of pressure from civil rights and immigrant justice groups, who launched online petitions and interrupted Clinton’s public events, demanding she cut ties with the private prison industry.


So Bill & Hillary passed a prison bill THAT DIDN'T HELP. Prison Rates Went Up While Crime Was Reportedly ON A Downward Trend. They made money from this deal. These are facts.


To anyone rational person these are damning facts. But it doesn't seem like we are dealing with rational people anymore.

Summary of some side argument going on;

Take a look at this extract from Mother Jones (the only relevant part is what happened right after the crime bill passed, i.e. was it better or worse?);


Since the crime bill passed (the dotted line) mass incarceration continued to grow and Bill & Hillary continued to make money through thier Private Prison friends... which they JUST stopped because it became an election issue, i.e. where do Bill & Hillary stand on mass incarceration personally? "It's a good investment unless you want to run for President".

I guess if you must argue for the friends of a war criminal who believes they are doing a good job THEN you could argue that Bill & Hillary did NOT help people in any way and allowed a bad situation to get worse. Their Bill did nothing to the situation except give them credentials to get Private Prison money donations. The increase in prison populations was just what we like to do to black and poor people. Why do Bill & Hillary even pass Bills in the first place? Probably just to make money in some way since they have no effect on society. But still, why turn the Government over to someone who will use it as thier personal piggy bank?



Whatever argument comes up. Hillary does get stuff done. Horrible stuff. And she does it by being passionate about advocating for it.




She does that allot.

Hillary Clinton Iraq War Vote Speech



I think maybe once she was right (maybe twice?). Surely you can't elect someone on the hope that in 4 (8 years with election fraud) she will get 1 or 2 things right? What about all the horrible stuff she will do (if her history is anything to judge by). Some people just don't care about who they are voting for. You know a woman can be evil too, right? She would just do it more affectionately. It's how the female brain is designed. But we need someone with more than just a female brain. We need someone who can make correct decisions that help EVERYONE and NEVER a small group of people (no matter how rich they are). This whole aristocrat and serf model that the establishment Democrats run by is just wrong. Help the rich. Make it harder for the poor (on whom does the tax burden for running the country fall?) ... "don't worry, we'll get your money by giving it to our friends and they will pass it on to us through speech money. You can work all your lives to pay back any mistakes they make. It's OK. We are smarter than you. We deserve this money more, our birth tells us so. Money doesn't generate money. Some people just have it and others don't. Those who do can take more from others and we will help and cause that's who we are as well. As it should be. As it's always been. Master and Serf."). The fact that they believe it bothers me more than anything else (determined by their actions).



Feb 24, 2016

Hillary VS Trump: A Polite Person With A Record VS A Rude Person Without A Record. Lets See What That Might Look Like Shall We?


OK. Lets start with Trump. Trump has no record. He's a TV reality star from a rich family who dabbled in real estate, successfully. All anyone has on him is that he has been rude to the ears of some people.

Hillary HAS a record. This is a record that can and PROBABLY WILL be exploited by Donald Trump in a possible General Election match up.

What is Hillary's record?

Taking money from Private Prisons while pushing mass incarceration for all (that disproportionately affected black people being poor), something Bernie doesn't talk about from a mistaken sense of politeness, will be a big issue with Trump. Since it's a black issue not referred to much by the media. Lets take a look at what else is on Hillary's record...

Trump could be like: 'Hillary, shes a woman? She's more like a witch killing innocent people in other countries and putting the Blacks in jail for money and then cutting her connections with the private prison industry cause she needed votes in an election'

OR

Trump could be like: 'Hillary was complimented by Henry Kissinger, an actual war criminal! I don't believe it! So this woman is going around killing people, you know mass murder - genocide! - so anyways, this woman is going around the world committing mass murder and what are mothers gonna tell your daughters? Maybe one day you can grow up and be a mass murdering war criminal like Hillary? Is this what we want to teach our young girls?"

OR


"I can't handle the Presidency? Her Husband, on a policy he still defends mind you, actually brought about the collapse of the country's economy by pushing for deregulation by the advice of some fiction writer fan? I love the guy and all but how stupid can you be to dismantle the whole system and let it fall apart like that?"


OR

"Jesus! Did you hear Bill is a prophet! No Really, let me tell you I was surprised myself, this guy 10 HOURS BEFORE 9/11 was giving a speech to this business group in Australia and said 'he didn't kill Osama bin laden because we would have to blow up a town of 300 and he feels bad about it'. Amazing! SO I admire Bill's prophetic skills and all but after preparing the path for mass bombing of innocents they have made it a policy to go out and bomb people rather than negotiate. Henry Kissinger complimented the State Department under Hillary. Yemen is destabilizing from thier bombing and all. I can't believe the decision making skills on these people. Terrorism has gone up over 600% with Henry Kissinger, Bush, & Clinton's involvement (did you know they are all friends? I know, I can't believe it!). Basically, what I'm saying is that the Clinton's are good for some prophetic advice but bad for decision making in a position of leadership"

OR

'I may have said "they're rapists, they're murderes" but Hillary actually turned immigrants over to rapists and murderers in a bill she bragged about passing! OMG! I mean talk about heartless. I have alot of heart. I love people. I love people.'

What will Hillary say? Trump said mean shit? Trump was mean, she killed people. Trump was rude she started mass incarceration and made money off of it. Trump was mean and she changed her position from neo-con to Bernie cause America has had enough of Republicans. It's unfortunate people don't realize that the Clintons are basically just Republican calling themselves Democrats.

Fox News and the GOP have been saying this shit for years. Clearly Hillary supported the idea of not indicting Cheney & Bush for their Iraq War Treason (one thing which the alternative media DID cover in ridiculous detail) which means she silently ENDORSES spreading these sorts of beliefs into the population. She wants to "negotiate" with criminals rather than indicting them, why?

Trump: ..." Anyways, so Hillary started all these beliefs that I believe about the State of America today, endorsed by this administrations silence and now you want to blame me for telling you the truth as told to us by Fox News and the GOP? What? Are we supposed to do the worst things possible while being polite about it it to be acceptable as politicians? I have done NOTHING bad and I'm rude. Hillary has killed people and destroyed lives and is polite. That's the REAL difference."

 In a general election against Trump, you really think she can't be beaten by a rude guy?


Proofs for 'the GOP is a White Supremacist group pretending it's not'



From Salon:
In one major poll, Bernie Sanders is now leading Hillary Clinton nationally. In most others, he’s not far behind from the former Secretary of State. Vermont’s Senator already has an “edge over Clinton in matchups with GOP opponents,” dispelling Clinton’s electability myth. In an average of national polls, Bernie Sanders is less  than eight points from Hillary Clinton, after being over 50 points behind in 2015. In addition, there’s only one person capable of challenging a Republican in 2016 withoutJames Comey declaring national security was jeopardized by a private server.

Bernie Sanders is the only Democratic candidate capable of winning the White House in 2016. Please name the last person to win the presidency alongside an ongoing FBI investigation, negative favorability ratings, questions about character linked to continual flip-flops, a dubious money trail of donors, and the genuine contempt of the rival political party. In reality, Clinton is a liability to Democrats, and certainly not the person capable of ensuring liberal Supreme Court nominees and President Obama’s legacy.
The precious and all-knowing polls already show Bernie Sanders defeating Republicans in a general election and Robert Reich has already explained why Sanders can easily win the presidency. In a Huffington Post piece titled “6 Responses to Bernie Skeptic,” Reich debunks the trusted myth of Clinton supporters and Republicans:
“He’d never beat Trump or Cruz in a general election.”
Wrong. According to the latest polls, Bernie is the strongest Democratic candidate in the general election, defeating both Donald Trump and Ted Cruz in hypothetical matchups. (The latest RealClear Politics averages of all polls shows Bernie beating Trump by a larger margin than Hillary beats Trump, and Bernie beating Cruz while Hillary loses to Cruz.)
“America would never elect a socialist.”
P-l-e-a-s-e. America’s most successful and beloved government programs are social insurance – Social Security and Medicare. A highway is a shared social expenditure, as is the military and public parks and schools. The problem is we now have excessive socialism for the rich (bailouts of Wall Street, subsidies for Big Ag and Big Pharma, monopolization by cable companies and giant health insurers, giant tax-deductible CEO pay packages) – all of which Bernie wants to end or prevent.
As Reich points out in his article, America is already a nation of Democratic-Socialists, but many of us (Democrats and Republicans) simply uphold “excessive socialism for the rich.”
Bernie Sanders, unlike Clinton, defeats Donald Trump in a landslide of  “epic proportions” in a general election and is the antithesis of a Republican. If you don’t believe me, then watch my friend Brian Hanley’s animated rap videos about Bernie Sanders demolishing Donald Trump.
Most importantly, and something the naysayers should learn, is that Bernie Sandersdoes better than Clinton against the GOP in a general election.
In addition, American voters don’t trust Hillary Clinton. At what point will critics of Bernie Sanders realize that American voters will never vote for a candidate they don’t trust and don’t like? In October of 2015, I explained in the following YouTube segment why Clinton is unelectable, and in another segment why Clinton must always evolve on key issues.
53.8% of all American voters have an “unfavorable” view of Hillary Clinton.
67% of American voters find Hillary Clinton “not honest and trustworthy,” compared with 59% for Donald Trump. Yes, more people trust Donald Trump.