Hillary Clinton's argument for not release her extremely well-paid Goldman Sachs speeches is: 'If others will release them I will release them'... THAT HAS TO BE THE CRAZIEST ARGUMENT EVER!
Someone needs to ask Hillary Clinton this:
PLEASE TELL US THE NAMES OF THESE PEOPLE WHO HAVE TO RELEASE THEIR WALL STREET SPEECHES BEFORE YOU DO AND WE WILL GO TALK TO THEM AND ASK THEM TO BE PATRIOTS AND RELEASE THEIR WALL STREET TRANSCRIPTS. SO THAT YOUR HIGHNESS CAN RELEASE HERS.
WHO ARE YOU RUNNING AGAINST HILLARY? BERNIE SANDERS HAS NO PAID SPEECHES TO WALL STREET WHATSOEVER. ARE YOU SAYING DONALD TRUMP HAS BEEN GIVING PAID SPEECHES TO WALL STREET AND YOU NEED HIM TO RELEASE HIS TRANSCRIPTS BEFORE YOU RELEASE YOURS? THAT's CRAZY. YOU ARE NOT GOING TO FACE HIM TILL THE GENERAL ELECTIONS!!!!!
Politico made some guesses of what Hillary might have said, which seems OK enough for a release;
Obviously, she's not going to criticize Goldman Sachs... their wealth is a gift from the Clinton's deregulation... as is their complete lack of accountability to the taxpayers who bailed them out. Clinton's also go out of their way to get the poor people to pay them back and never having the option to declare bankruptcy which rich people seem entitled to.