Jan 30, 2015

9/11 Mysteries: The Smoking Guns - The 9/11 Commission Was Clearly Corrupted (Proven Using The Daily Show)


The post is divided into 2 parts. The first part is a bunch of information showing that there was something seriously wrong with the 9/11 Commission followed by the second part which covers a couple of smoking guns which seem to have been purposely ignored in the investigations of the 9/11 Commission... clearly proving it was corrupted and it's conclusions can't be trusted.


Introduction 

Moment of Zen - President George W. Bush and Dick Cheney had a... ... ... ... "good conversation" with the 9/11 commission.




Problems with the 9/11 Commission:


Then there was the opposition to the 9/11 commission followed by reports of 9/11 commission shenanigans by the Bush Administation (Why?)


• O'Reilly falsely claimed Bush didn't oppose 9-11 Commission. O'Reilly defended President George W. Bush from a Kerry-Edwards '04 TV ad highlighting Bush's opposition to creation of the 9-11 Commission by denying that Bush had ever opposed the commission. In fact, Bush did oppose the creation of the 9-11 Commission. (10/21/04)




On The Censuring Of The 911 Commission: "I think there are things they knew which they didn't share with the public" Philip Shenon...



Highlight




Thomas Kean talks about the process of getting over two million documents in spite of bipartisan resistance to the 9/11 commission. (7:17):




Headlines - Blame - Former Secretaries of State and Defense from the Bush and Clinton administrations, along with former counterterrorism chief Richard Clarke, testify before the 9/11 Commission. (9:54)



It's clear that Richard Clarke's testimony, if taken seriously, would certainly have implicated the Bush Administration in purposely letting the attacks happen... given JUST how much evidence couldn't be hidden from the public;

The Clinton administration left the Bush administration with only a series of actionable items listed together on a piece of paper, not a plan. (8:11) {This is what the whole 'Clinton should have got Bin Laden' episode was about, Bush's "incompetence"}:



Highlight




9/11 Commission: Clarke's Testimony - Richard Clark has seen the Washington matrix for what it is, and now he's trying to force feed us the red pill. (2:50):




Daily Show: Dick Cheney doesn't recall Richard Clarke warning the White House of an imminent terrorist attack months before 9/11:




First, the following video compares and contrasts the difference in which an investigation was handled in the UK as opposed to here in the US... and makes it clear that this was a VERY strange investigation as Bush & Cheney seem to have dictated the rules of the inquiry and didn't even put their replies on the official record!

Accountability in the U.K. - David Cameron Kills it 





 Highlight




The Smoking Guns


The Iraq War





Help provided by the right wing media (as usual) here are some samples;


• O'Reilly falsely claimed Iraq had ricin. O'Reilly responded to a caller to his radio show by defending the Iraq war: "They did have ricin up there in the north -- so why are you discounting that so much?" In fact, the Duelfer report (the final report of the Iraqi Survey Group, led by Charles A. Duelfer, which conducted the search for weapons in Iraq following the U.S.-led invasion) indicates that Iraq did not have ricin. (10/19/04)


• O'Reilly repeated discredited claims on Iraq-Al Qaeda link. O'Reilly interrupted a former Clinton administration official who tried to correct the record on O'Reilly's claim that terrorist Abu Musab al-Zarqawi constitutes a direct link between Al Qaeda and Saddam Hussein's Iraq. He also allowed a conservative guest to repeat without challenge other discredited claims about Iraq's supposed involvement in terrorism -- claims O'Reilly has himself cited in the past. (9/27/04)








Related:

The Iraq War - ILLUSTRATED



WTC 7






Authorities knew all day that Building 7 would fall because it was a preplanned demolition & the media was prepping its viewers for it...


Here is video evidence of news anchors/reporters knowing the impossible before it happened... 




The problem was, as NIST acknowledged after the architect & engineer outcry, that NEVER EVER in the history of building buildings has a building fallen like that unless it was a demolition. There was simply no scientific explanation for what happened before the NIST "investigation" proved that for the first time in history a fire (a tiny fire, apparently, in some corner of the building) can cause a building to fall like it was demolished. How the authorities knew that this never before occurring event would happen that day, all day, without any real precedent for? Well, like I've said in my previous posts in this series. The anti science party has a tendency for coming up with explanations AND strategies before actually consulting a scientist to discover if the particular theory they are going with in their official story is even possible or not.

Highlights:

NIST: "Our take-home message today is that the reason for the collapse of World Trade Center 7 is no longer a mystery," 

"This is the first time that we are aware of, that a building taller than about 15 stories has collapsed primarily due to fires," Sunder told reporters at the press conference. "What we found was that uncontrolled building fires--similar to fires experienced in other tall buildings--caused an extraordinary event, the collapse of WTC7." 

i.e. this is a view of the "uncontrolled fires" that are supposed to have caused the WTC 7 to fall (see any fires? All I see is some smoke and one tiny fire)...

The building was BARELY on fire (not to mention showing NO MAJOR DAMAGE). Here is a video proving that fact:





 This is what a real fire looks like (& this building didn't collapse like a pancake!):



The building didn't fall. Why? Because skyscrapers don't fall from fire cause they are built using steel beams. So how can something which isn't possible and which we could never have known before the fire (cause architects and engineers solved this problem a long time ago to bring the buildings UP TO CODE) have been known about to the point that everyone in the media was waiting for it to happen?

Answer: Because it was clearly what it was. i.e. a controlled demolition set up by the GOP administration AND announced (being the anti science party) for the purposes of effect. The problem was that the lack of science was so significant that the Republicans and - after a "good conversation" - the Democrats  that including anything about WTC 7 was a bad idea in the 9/11 Commission Report.

BTW, the other thing the NIST is pushing in it's proof of something which has never happened before is that there would have been sounds of explosions.

NIST: Moreover, the smallest charge capable of initiating column failure "would have resulted in a sound level of 130 dB [decibels] to 140 dB at a distance of at least half a mile." Witnesses did not report hearing such a loud noise, nor is one audible on recordings of the collapse. 



Clearly they didn't do a real investigation...






9/11 - WTC 7 Explosion on Audio (heard by firemen)





WTC7 in 7 Minutes - 9/11 Explosions not Fire




If this was a planned demolition that the most important - and loudest - charges for the demolition could have been set up right after the WTC towers were hit to use that chaos as cover (even if we discount the explosion we actually caught on video). It sounds unbelievable, but go ahead and notice what it looks like when two buildings fall in a controlled demolition (which takes at least a week to set up)...




Now, try reading this post.




Related Posts:

1. An Overview Of The Strange Inconsistencies In The OFFICIAL Account Of The 9/11 Incident Using The Daily Show




Jan 29, 2015

Joe of Morning Joe - The Other Guy Posing As A Non Bought Liberal On MSNBC

 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Phil Donahue on His 2003 Firing from MSNBC, When Liberal Network Couldn’t Tolerate Antiwar Voices 



The Daily Show: The Koch Brothers bring campaign financing to the next level when they pledge close to $1 billion to Republican causes in the 2016 presidential election. (8:04)



----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Wednesday roundup: GOP, Obama at 50 percent NBC News’ Chuck Todd and Robert Costa join Morning Joe to discuss the potential 2016 GOP field and who among the current crop is likely to lead. And President Obama’s approval number is at 50 percent, according to Gallup.



Notes:

at 30-40 secs - Fox News had initially backed Rudy Giuliani .

From 50 secs on wards Chuck Todd sets up the false belief that Jeb Bush could get pushed out of his own primary. Then Joe does some shill work.

1:42 to round off the setup - to make it more believable and to create a "narrative" - they talk about Huckabee whose gonna come forward with the belief that gays are awful (which he will refrain from 'cause that's what people want nowadays) and that women are essential the property of man or so on. So he gets the 25% of the GOP that are ultra conservative (evangelicals) with co-ordinated lies and then he endorses Jeb Bush when he loses. (the whole thing of people jumping in from all over the place to "run for prez cause the field is open"is just a con)

At 2:46 Joe begins his pushing of the Koch Brothers agenda and how cool the GOP are. It gets pretty obvious. Then they make it clear what the GOP's play is gonna be.



Koch Bros. to spend $889M: What it means Top Talkers: The Koch Brothers plan to spend close to $900 million on the 2016 campaign, according to a New York Times report. That kind of money, the story suggests, would “allow their political organization to operate at the same financial scale as the Democratic and Republican Parties.” Writer Nicholas Confessore discusses.



This one is fascinating. Joe is clearly selling the idea of selling our democracy to the highest bidder as "the wave of the future". If this doesn't indicate where his loyalties lie (with money), nothing does.

I think its clear now that from the Supreme Court's decision to hand an election to the GOP without completing a vote count 'cause it's good for our unity' (why? because the greatest democracy in the world can't handle a vote count?) simply continued with it's "citizens united" decision.


Notes:

Citizen United is basically legalized bribery. The precedent for this (for a mental comparison) is when GOP led Congress legalized insider trading for itself. Only citizens united was done by the GOP weighted Supreme Court.


From a Supreme Court point of view: Citizen united is like a fire sale where everything must go... only the stuff being sold is our country. i.e. As a result of the disastrous Citizens United Supreme Court decision, billionaires and large corporations can now spend an unlimited amount of money


Easy to Catch Hypocrisy: The policies being pushed by the GOP are the same failed economic policies pushed by Bush. Koch Brothers are simply the new face of the GOP i.e. like getting George Bush & Jeb Bush together at once. It's not a secret but there does seem to be a the media's GOP echo chamber problem.


Escape From Rich Mountain - Republicans try to distance themselves from Mitt Romney but then propose the same policy measures as the former presidential candidate. (3:00):






Koch Brother Highlights:


EXPOSED: Koch Industries and Cancer Risk




The Young Turks: Koch Brothers Exposed for Cancer Causing Pollution




How the Koch Brothers Cause Cancer By Dumping Toxic Waste Everywhere • Koch Brothers Exposed 2014




Koch Brothers Exposed for Cancer Causing Pollution




The Daily Show: The Koch Brothers become The Daily Show's latest sponsor, prompting Jon to welcome them with some minor adjustments to their advertisement. (4:12):



Colbert Report: The Koch brothers-funded Americans for Prosperity PAC sends absentee ballot applications with minor inaccuracies to Wisconsin's Democratic districts. (2:52):







Related post:



Jan 26, 2015

UFO Mysteries: UFO Sightings & Recordings Have Reached A Breaking Point As Classified Files Are Released (What Are The UFO's Up To?)


Discussing the mystery of the UFO's is now mainstream.

First, footage from the BBC...






Query:

What if UFO's start landing all over the place & beings step out & say 'We are your Gods who have returned' , or something like that - given that a UFO seems to have hovered over the dome of the rock (holy to all three Abraham religions)

Fox News Anchor Scared Of UFO Sighting Over Jerusalem's Dome Of The Rock



Why would aliens declare to be our Gods? Cause all 3 faiths worship at their spaceports (Note: this is an idea I got from someone who came up with some conclusions I disagree with, so I'm keeping the source separate but this seems to be the most reasonable possibility given biblical passages - including those banned by the ancient Roman Catholic Church & not just the Sumerian texts).

UFO - Dome of the rock - Temple mount - Jerusalem 28.01.2011




Notice the red lights?  Could it be the bottom of the Mother Ship? i.e. it was probably trying to land!

Look at it from another angle...

Dome of the Rock UFO Jerusalem - New close up footage





Biblical Verses About An Alien Attack from Genesis? 

Genesis 24: Then the Lord rained down burning sulfur on Sodom and Gomorrah—from the Lord out of the heavens.

 25 Thus he overthrew those cities and the entire plain, destroying all those living in the cities—and also the vegetation in the land.

26 But Lot’s wife looked back, and she became a pillar of salt. 

 27 Early the next morning Abraham got up and returned to the place where he had stood before the Lord. 28 He looked down toward Sodom and Gomorrah, toward all the land of the plain, and he saw dense smoke rising from the land, like smoke from a furnace."


Once again...

Gen 26: "But his wife looked back from behind him, and she became a pillar of salt." - Alien Nuke?




More interesting footage;

UFO Compilation 2011...





UFO Sightings Compilation January 2014 best UFO






BBC links:


Added Feb 5 2015:


Ask yourself... if the UFO phenomenon wasn't real why would all this information be classified for over half a century?

Classified UFO documents releasedSource: CNN Wed January 21, 2015



Moment Of Zen:


Neil deGrasse Tyson - Stephen asks Neil deGrasse Tyson what dark matter is because he doesn't see the color of matter. (6:11):


Wednesday June 25, 2008: Neil deGrasse Tyson explained at 5 minutes that the Mars Rover is only looking for conditions where life COULD exist even-though on earth there is ALWAYS life where there is water. Recently the rover sent with all it's sophisticated sensing equipment ... ALSO, didn't carry a simple test for life. At what point do we say, "OK, enough. What have you guys found that yall are not telling us about?".
Again and again, we discover "anomalies" (stuff that makes no sense). Rather than covering it up, pretending it doesn't exist, sending up one satillite after another to Mars and forgetting to add a simple scooper to test for life (even though water on Mars is now confirmed... and was ALWAYS a part of the theory of how the Martian surface came to be that way)...

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


A movie that is a cult classic from which a great deal of conspiracy theories seem to originate! I don't agree with any of them theories.


Public Domain Cult Classic Movie: Plan 9 from Outer Space (1959)



Chuck Todd: A GOP & Bill O Reilly Representative In NBC's "Meet The Press" (Posing As a Non-Bought Liberal)

Background:

Phil Donahue on His 2003 Firing from MSNBC, When Liberal Network Couldn’t Tolerate Antiwar Voices 


The people of Dick Cheney's & Rupert Murdoch's Fox News have been copying my posts - REVERSING IT's MEANING - and pretending it's them that said what they said. I covered this before. So, first I will put up some links to the GOP stooges copying me and then my latest discovery, i.e. Chick Todd of Meet The Press is a confirmed part of the GOP cabal (as is Morning Joe, who is busy throwing childish decoys for my amusement).

Posts of mine proving them traitors are copying me:




Note: Chuck Todd is the same person who did this...


Above image if from this video:

 This one shows that in any particular circumstance the whole media (MSNBC, CNN & FOXNEWS) can function as a GOP/Fox News/ "Conservative" echo chamber, in this case it was to pretend a candidate didn't exist... 










Moving on, once again Chuck Todd helps the fake right:

Kareem Abdul-Jabbar responds to comments by Fox News Host Bill O'Reilly on Islam's response to terrorism.






Bill here is copying me when I said in the following post from Feb 2014:


Why this dichotomy? It has to do with the Christians lack of belief in thier scripture. While a Muslim follows scripture a Christian follows thier leader that's why they emphasize being a 'flock of sheep' cause that's how they have historically been taught to function. When you ask 'why it is OK to eat Pork or get tattoos or weave two types of cloths together which is forbidden in the book of Leviticus'he/she gets a reply 'because Jesus came and abrogated past laws' ...



but when you ask 'so why do you persecute gays when that's also in the Book of Leviticus AND Jesus said nothing about gays especially when you aren't following the other laws of the Book of Leviticus' you draw a blank. The question simply doesn't penetrate. To a Muslim this is very confusing as they follow scripture so they think the Christians scripture has been corrupted and they have gone made when in reality the answer is simpler than that... Christians NEVER read thier scripture. Is is read for them by a 'chosen one' who then guides them from thier. These MAJOR cultural differences cause major problems in International Relations.


Christian Scripture Not Followed (well mostly, well, not intentionally anyways):

1. Leviticus 19:27 “‘Do not cut the hair at the sides of your head or clip off the edges of your beard.

2. Leviticus 5:2 "'Or if a person touches anything ceremonially unclean--whether the carcasses of unclean wild animals or of unclean livestock or of unclean creatures that move along the ground--even though he is unaware of it, he has become unclean and is guilty

3. Leviticus 11:7 And the pig, though it has a split hoof completely divided, does not chew the cud; it is unclean for you.

4. Leviticus 11:9 "'Of all the creatures living in the water of the seas and the streams, you may eat any that have fins and scales.

5. Deuteronomy 22:9 Do not plant two kinds of seed in your vineyard; if you do, not only the crops you plant but also the fruit of the vineyard will be defiled

6. Deuteronomy 22:11 Do not wear clothes of wool and linen woven together.

7. Leviticus 19:19 "'Keep my decrees. "'Do not mate different kinds of animals. "'Do not plant your field with two kinds of seed. "'Do not wear clothing woven of two kinds of material.

Hosea 13:16 (King James) Samaria will bear her guilt because she has rebelled against her God.
They will fall by the sword; their little ones will be dashed to pieces, and their pregnant women ripped open.

Numbers 31: 17-18
17. Now therefore kill every male among the little ones, and kill every woman that hath known man by lying with him.
18. But all the women children, that have not known a man by lying with him, keep alive for yourselves.

Deuteronomy 20:16
However, in the cities of the nations the Lord your God is giving you as an inheritance, do not leave alive anything that breathes.

1 Samuel 15:2-4
2 Thus saith the LORD of hosts, I remember that which Amalek did to Israel, how he laid wait for him in the way, when he came up from Egypt.
3 Now go and smite Amalek, and utterly destroy all that they have, and spare them not; but slay both man and woman, infant and suckling, ox and sheep, camel and ass.
4 And Saul gathered the people together, and numbered them in Telaim, two hundred thousand footmen, and ten thousand men of Judah.

Psalm 137:8-9
8 O daughter of Babylon, O destroyed one, O the happiness of him who repayeth to thee thy deed, That thou hast done to us.
9 O the happiness of him who doth seize, And hath dashed thy sucklings on the rock!

Basically what a Christian "leader" does is pick and choose which laws he or she will follow by using the quotes below to make his chosen obsoletes valid while he is never questioned on what he or she chooses to implement as questioning is not allowed within the Christian institution itself (unlike the Muslim one where is not only allowed but encouraged and only during educational dark ages does it get out of hand like when the Christian Nazi movement took over Europe, ex 'the pen is mightier than the sword'):

I have tons of proof on this which goes from my "Islam" category on LIberal Libertarianism.org to the following video...

At 3:50 - "Definitions of marriage in Deuteronomy (An Old Testament Book)"...




Bill is just using my post as part of his "frame a religion" plan that he has been pursuing for a while (& CHUCK TODD IS CLEARLY HELPING HIM)...


Here is Bill O Reilly using Chuck Todd as an example of truth! (We all know how Fox News does "truth", don't we?)



(The above is covered in more detail here - just the video of above image if from is here - Note: I've also noticed Bill use points from my ISIS post as well ....or was my comments about ISIS on twitter? or both?)



This part is the clincher. Notice the following still Meet The Press has kindly provided for the world to see as a "talking point"... from a station that is well known for using lies as it's main political activism method.




Bill has been after Pakistan, for some reason, for a while. Poor Pakistan, already having bowed to the Bush Administration to the point where Bush declared them to be "A Major Non-Nato Ally" (I hear NATO membership is hard), is simply doing what the Military wants them to do. The CIA launches drones from bases the US Military has INSIDE Pakistan. How much more of an ally does one have to get? Here is what Iran's strategic position looks like (Pakistan is the country on the extreme right with the four stars representing US Military Bases).



Here is some other information Bill The Terrorist doesn't want you to see:

Mike Mullen - Former Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Mike Mullen discusses the challenges posed by ISIS and the disconnect between the U.S. military and the rest of American society. (7:30):



Related Articles:

New Focus on Pakistan’s Lawless Border Region


A wild frontier - It will take more than American missiles to bring order to Pakistan’s north-western border region

PDF Report of Islamic Militancy in the border regions (where Pakistan has it's own troops as well)

Did you know that there are two different Taliban groups? (but is often reported on as one group)

A Pakistani Journalist responds to some of the questions (this is old info, Bill should have read stuff like this by now UNLESS this latest round of smearing Pakistan has some ulterior motive? I'm half Pakistani from my fathers side, could that be the reason?)

Many think, after 9/11, Al Qaeda went to the tribal areas [of Pakistan]. What you know about that?Definitely they did. Definitely. The whole of Al Qaeda's moved into Pakistan. First they moved into the tribal areas. Pretty much they are there -- even today they are there. There is pretty strong evidence available to suggest that some of the Arabs who speak local native language, the Pashto, that wear native dresses, they look like native people. They are the guest of tribal people in South Waziristan and North Waziristan. I've been meeting people who know it for sure in their own areas -- there are Arabs living there as guests of some tribal people.

I would think that some people in the government may also know, have some ideas. But as long as these people are not creating trouble and they are just sitting quiet, the government are not ready to confront them. They don't want to create a problem for themselves.

What is it about the tribal areas? I mean, people watching this program don't know what these tribal areas are or what they represent. What is it about these places that makes them such a good hiding place for Al Qaeda?

They are often categorized as semi-autonomous areas. But for all practical purpose, before 9/11, they were autonomous areas. There was no law there. The law was gun and drugs. These people trade in gun and guns only. There was no other thing. Maybe smuggling. So it was a lawless terrain, completely out of Pakistan's control.

These people don't accept any laws. They didn't even accept the Durand Line, the border between Pakistan and Afghanistan. They never had any travel documents to go into Afghanistan or coming back from there. So there are tremendous linkages there. These people have no law, no Pakistani law government.

And they're in the same tribe as the Taliban?

Yes, in most cases. There are different types, but they share the area. They share the terrain. They share the culture, and they all share a very deep, religious leanings. They consider themselves ultra-religious people. Yes, the rest would like to call them the sheer fundamentalists.



Other proofs in this series:

Information/Press 1 - Setting The Stage for Understanding The Corporate Media's Past


Information/Press 2 - A Quick Look Back At How Well The Information About Iraq Was Presented To The American People


Information/Press 3 - The GOP/Fox News/"Conservative" Echo Chamber


Information/Press 4 -  Tracing The Corporate Media's Money & Political Trail To Determine The Source Of Their Bias




Related:


Faces Of The Media: Angry Echo Chamber, Squirrel Reporting, Manufactured News & Script Reading